Top Shia Scholar says Quran is corrupt


al-Salamu `Aleykum,

Shia leader and the sheikh of their Fuqaha‘ and Muhadditheen `Ali al-Yazdi al-Ha’eri claims that the Qur’an is corrupt in volume 1 of his book “Ilzam al-Nasib fi Ithbat al-Hujjah al-Gha’ib” page 477.

He says under the title “Khasa’is al-Hujjah (aj)” while counting all the characteristics of their Mahdi and the events that will unfold in his time, we jump to the sixteenth one:

[Number sixteen: The appearance of the Mushaf of `Ali (as) which he collected after the death of the Prophet (SAWS) as was narrated by `Ali (as) in “Ghaybat al-Nu`mani”, he says: “It’s as if I see the non-Arabs making their tents around the Masjid of al-Kufa, teaching the people the Qur’an as it was revealed.” it was said: “O Ameer al-Mu’mineen (as), is our Qur’an not as it was revealed?” he replied: “No, seventy (men) from Quraysh were erased from it with their names and the names of their fathers, the name of abu Lahab was only left behind to disgrace the Prophet (SAWS) since he was his uncle.”]

 

 

Shia Scholar about Quran

By Hani
Posted by 13S2010

 

8 Comments

Filed under Revealing Shia sect, Tahreef in Quran

8 responses to “Top Shia Scholar says Quran is corrupt

  1. Truth

    This is so ridiculously ignorant, its sad. instead of pointing out ONE source, from a “popular shia scholar” I’ve never heard of, from a work I’ve never heard of, why don’t you bring numerous examples from MANY(or how about all) well-known shia scholars (Sistani, Khamenai, Shirazi, even Hassanain and Ammar Nakshwani!) that do believe the Quran is NOT corrupt and use it as a source of reference in all their speeches and whenever making a statement about Islam, because it is the word of Allah (swt) and says so IN the Quran- that the Quran cannot be corrupt or changed, unlike what happened in time with the Tawrat and Injeel.
    Instead of bashing and hating on fellow your Muslims who believe in the same shahadah as you, why not make a site PROMOTING and SPREADING the message of Islam- proving its truth and beauty and essence, and bringing people closer to the religion; not wasting your time creating, deepening, and showing a division within this perfect deen.

    • This scholar is bigger scholar than Sistani, Khamenai and Shirazi.

      Also, when did Hassanain and Ammar Nakhswani become top Shia scholars? It is clear who is ignorant here.

      Don’t forget biggest Shia shcolars who believed in Tahrif Quran like Ali bin Ibrahim Qumi, Jazairi, Bahrani, Majlisi and tens of others.

  2. Peace

    The Quran states:
    “Surely We have revealed the Reminder and We will most surely be its preserver.” (15:9)
    As a muslim, we believe without a doubt, every word in the Quran, including this ayah, is from and only from Allah (swt).
    likewise, the shia school of thought, as muslims would never go against this belief.
    [NO LINKS ALLOWED]
    Even Tabatabai says: “The Qur’an, which Almighty Allah descended on the Prophet Muhammad (S), is protected from any change.” [Tafseer ul Meezan, volume 12, page 109, Published Iran]
    Syed sistani, another scholar, stated [in Ahdath al-Istiftaat al-Aqedia, page 454]:
    “The Quran that exists in our hands is the same as that which was revealed upon Allah’s messenger (pbuh) without addition or loss”
    and you’ll find more about the shia scholar’s beliefs on tahrif of Quran here:
    [NO LINKS ALLOWED]
    including Majllisi, as you have mentioned.

  3. AND WHO BURNT ALL THE COPIES COMPILED BY UMAR-ABU BAKAR , USMAN BURNT QORAAN

  4. WELL , WELL OVER 24 YEARS WAS THE ILLEGITIMATE RULE OF KHOLAFA E SALASAH IN WHICH WHAT THEY DID ALLAH ONLY KNOWS , IF IT WAS A JUNGLE RAJ ANY THING COULD HAVE HAPPENED , AT LEAST THIS MUCH IS ACCEPTED BY SUNNIES THAT USMAN REJECTED THOSE COPIES COLLECTED BY ABU BAKR AND UMAR , GOT IT BURNT & DESTROYED ONLY KEPT ONE WITH HIM WHICH WAS FURTHER DUPLICATED . SO IF ANY CHANGES WERE INCORPORATED ,MEANING ADDITION , ALTERATION , IT IS JUST POSSIBLE , WHO KNOWS , THESE INFIDELS COULD HAVE DONE ANYTHING .
    THIS MUCH IS SURE THAT THEY HAVE SOMEHOW NOT BEEN ABLE TO ADD ANY THING , THAT WAS ALLAH’S PROMISE OTHERWISE ON EVERY PAGE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN THE NAMES OF THE THREE , LIKE THE SAUDI KINGS HAVE GOT THEIR NAMES EMBROIDERED AT MANY PLACES OF THE COVER OF THE KHANA E KAABAH . INFIDELS THEY .

    • zillay shah

      do hasnain and naqshwani author any works where they discuss the works of the pioneers of shia faith? no they are speakers that charge a hefty amount for lectures naqshwani keeps no secret about that, so its absurd to show him or any present shia scholar as the brand ambassador of the shia faith, especially when it is known shia aqeeda has evolved and changed over time. Secondly with the dangerous overdosed usuage of taqiya attributed to the imams of guidence who would say things according to the shia just to please the mases they were supposed to guide. With that being the case of the leaders , acording to shia can misguide then what would be the case with the scholars of misguidence?. Where to draw the line with this dangerous belief of habitual lying what to know what is truth and what is lying?.

      When the shia scholars praise the quran are they praising the Quran with the muslims or the one compiled by Imam Ali acording to the shia or the one with Imam mehdi?, how do we know for certain?. You see shia can talk about fadak caliphate or any topic like black majic and tell the masess how its belief is dangerous to the credibility of Prophethood, i ask is any belief more dangerous then taqiya? where a supposed guide lies denies amply contradicts and for what greater purpose one may ask, when taqiya is against the very foundation of a hadi which is to guide no matter what the consequence.

      To the man zaheer hussain you reffered to prominent sahabah as infidels god forbid, do you know they are called just in the holy book and Abu bakr is called the companion of the prophet with nass from the holy Quran.

      As for burning , i think you shia are unaware of your own writings read the al bayan fi tafseer al quran by al khoie where he points out the purpose was to stop mis pronounciation with people writing scripture in there own dialects. And khoie finds no fault in it. This al khoie was the grand marja of the shia world head of the hausa from where naqshawani and the likes derive knowledge from.

  5. gulbat shah

    Shias on the whole do not believe in alteration but I was surprised to read the published letters of imam khomeini in one of which to his son he rants about corruption of the quran and early companions of the prophet, stating that they ruined the quran. Maybe perhaps he was referring to its proper application and subversion of its teachings and not the text.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s