Infallible Imam slams Taqqiyah against the wall

Imam abu ‘Abdillah slams Taqqiyah against the wall

Article by Hani (aka TripolySunni)
Posted by 13S2010 with some changes
Original Article Link here

al-Salamu ‘Aleykum,

Yes it’s Rafidhi Taqqiyah again, and can we really have enough topics on this Satanic Shia invention?

The books of the folks are full of Taqqiyah and conflicting reports from their “infallible” Imams to an extent that no matter is free from differences of opinion, their renowned scholar Ja’far al-Subhani says in “al-Rasael al-Arba’ah” pg.201:

عندما نطالع كتابي: الوسائل، والمستدرك مثلاً؛ نرى أنه ما من باب من أبواب الفقه إلا وفيه اختلاف في رواياته، وهذا مما أدى إلى رجوع بعض ممن استبصروا عن مذهب الإمامية

[When we read the two books (of Hadith): Wasael al-Shia and Mustadrak al-Wasael for example, we see that there is no chapter or Fiqhi section which is free from conflicting narrations, this has caused some of those who converted to the Imami Madhab to leave it.]

This matter has become so serious that some of their biggest scholars left the Madhab, such as the teacher of their leader al-Tusi, in “Rasael fi Dirayat al-Hadith” by abu al-Fadl al-Babili vol.2 pg.223 & in “Tahtheeb al-Ahkam” vol.1 pg.2:

ثم ذكر عن شيخه أبي الحسن الهاروني العلوي أنه كان يعتقد الحق ، ويدين بالإمامة ، فرجع عنها لما التبس عليه الأمر في اختلاف الأحاديث ، وترك المذهب .

[Then he(al-Tusi) mentions about his teacher abu al-Hassan al-Harouni al-‘Alawi that he used to believe in the truth(Shia Madhab), and that he took Imamah as his religion, but he left it when he became confused because of the conflicting narrations, and he abandoned the Madhab.]

I say: the one who has opened their books of Hadith knows the gigantic amount of Hadiths that were labeled as Taqqiyah by the Shia scholars thinking that it would solve their problems, and MANY of these are authentic according to their standards, and this saves them the effort of having to make illogical and strange explanations in order to reconcile them. After reading these explanations one can only come to the conclusion that the Imam was on Taqqiyah most of his time, and this is indeed what many of their scholars stated in their books, and they said that even their closest companions never knew most of the religious rulings because the Imams would use Taqqiyah even on their own followers.

Their famous scholar and researcher Yusuf al-Bahrani said in “al-Hadaeq al-Nadirah” vol.1 pg.5:

فلم يعلم من أحكام الدين على اليقين إلا القليل، لامتزاج أخباره بأخبار التقية، كما اعترف بذلك ثقة الإسلام وعلم الأعلام محمد بن يعقوب الكليني نور الله مرقده في جامعه الكافي

[Only a small amount of the rulings of the religion were known for sure, because their narrations were mixed with the narrations of Taqqiyah, as was admitted by Thiqat al-Islam Muhammad bin Ya’aqoub al-Kulayni may Allah fill his grave with light in his collection al-Kafi]

So what we can conclude is that the Imams did Taqqiyah in just about everything, in all topics and all matters, for example:

وما رواه محمد بن أحمد بن يحيى عن أحمد بن محمد عن ابن سنان عن أبي الجارود قال: قلت لابي جعفر (ع) متى اسجد سجدتي السهو ؟ قال: قبل التسليم فانك إذا سلمت فقد ذهبت حرمة صلاتك. فالوجه في هذين الخبرين أن نحملهما على ضرب من التقية لانهما موافقان لمذاهب كثير من العامة

Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Yahya from Ahmad bin Muhammad from ibn Sinan from abu al-Jaroud: I said to abu Ja’far (as): “When do I make the two prostrations of forgetfulness?” he (as) said: “Before making Tasleem, because if you make Tasleem then your prayer is finished.”

Their scholar and leader al-Tusi commented on this narration and the others before it by saying: “These two narrations are to be considered a kind of Taqqiyah, because they agree with the Madhabs of many of the ‘Ammah(Sunnies).”

Tahtheeb al-Ahkam by Tusi 2/195, Istibsar by Tusi 1/380, Wasael al-Shia by ‘Amili 8/208.

As you can see they consider the smallest matters to be Taqqiyah such as if the two prostrations of forgetfulness were before or after Tasleem, and the examples are many… BUT is it true that their Imams did Taqqiyah as their scholars would like us to believe? The life that these great men lived shows otherwise and I’ll be quoting an example from their own books again.

al-Kafi vol.5 pg.449:

عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ أَبِيهِ عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي عُمَيْرٍ عَنْ عَلِيِّ بْنِ الْحَسَنِ بْنِ رِبَاطٍ عَنْ حَرِيزٍ عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا حَنِيفَةَ يَسْأَلُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ( عليه السلام ) عَنِ الْمُتْعَةِ فَقَالَ أَيَّ الْمُتْعَتَيْنِ تَسْأَلُ قَالَ سَأَلْتُكَ عَنْ مُتْعَةِ الْحَجِّ فَأَنْبِئْنِي عَنْ مُتْعَةِ النِّسَاءِ أَ حَقٌّ هِيَ فَقَالَ سُبْحَانَ اللَّهِ أَ مَا قَرَأْتَ كِتَابَ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَ جَلَّ فَمَا اسْتَمْتَعْتُمْ بِهِ مِنْهُنَّ فَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ فَرِيضَةً فَقَالَ أَبُو حَنِيفَةَ وَ اللَّهِ فَكَأَنَّهَا آيَةٌ لَمْ أَقْرَأْهَا قَطُّ .

‘Ali bin Ibrahim from his father from ibn abi ‘Umayr from ‘Ali bin al-Hassan bin Ribat from Hariz from ‘Abdul-Rahman bin abi ‘Abdullah: I heard abu Hanifa ask abu ‘Abdullah (as) about Mut’ah, so he (as) said: “Which of the two you ask about?” abu Hanifa said: “I am asking about the Mut’ah of women because I already asked you about the Mut’ah of Hajj, is it correct?” he (as) replied: “Subhanallah! Have you not read in the book of Allah (swt)? : {So for whatever you enjoy [of marriage] from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation.}” abu Hanifa said: “By Allah it is as if this is the first time I hear it.”

al-Majlisi said: Hasan in al-Miraat 20/229.
al-Behbudi said: Sahih in Sahih-ul-Kafi 3/45.

So I ask where is this infamous Taqqiyah you speak of? al-Sadiq wasn’t just talking to a random ignorant Muslim layman in the streets, nor was he talking about a small minor issue, he is talking about one of the biggest differences MUT’AH! and who is he talking to? he’s talking to the leader of the scholars of Baghdad and the head of one of the four Madhabs Imam abu Hanifa al-Nu’man!

There is no Taqqiyah, there are liars, many liars, and they have been deemed trustworthy and reliable by dishonest scholars of Rijal, that is the truth.

Allah will surely make evident those who are truthful, and He will surely make evident the liar. [Quran 29:3] 


Filed under Hadith science, Infallibility issues with shia imams, Revealing Shia sect, Shiite's sahih hadith

2 responses to “Infallible Imam slams Taqqiyah against the wall

  1. britz4gazaPeter Foley

    Why not just stop hating? You don’t like the Shia religion, then don’t, but there is no need to hate people for following a religion or aspect of that religion. I expect you hate Christians and Jews too?
    You start off by saying ‘al-Salamu ‘Aleykum’, shame on you for even uttering such a thing, it’s meaning is empty in your mouth before it makes a sound from your lips.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s