Fadak: Truth Vs Falsehood

Shia try to claim that Fadak was snatched by Abu Bakr[ra] from Fatima[ra] & try to quote hadiths from Bukhari & Muslim to bach-up this false claim [like anger of fatima[ra] & then Ali[ra] buried her secrately]!

But they skip many hadiths which is also on same issue but when: all narrations & view of ahul-sunnah scholars considered as a whole, then story leans to opposite  direction.

Let me first give u some brief theory:

The number of hadith which mention about Hazrat Fatima[ra] demand for share of the Fadak land are 15 [or may be more] in number. There are five hadith in Sahih Bukhari, three hadith in Sahih Muslim, two hadith in Ibn Tirmidhi, four hadith in Sunan Abi Dawood, and one hadith in Sunan Nisai.

Let me quote some of them: [& i will highlight the important part related to this topic.]

1. Bukhari :: Book 53 :: Volume 4 :: Hadith 325

Narrated ‘Aisha: (mother of the believers) After the death of Allah ‘s Apostle Fatima the daughter of Allah’s Apostle asked Abu Bakr As-Siddiq to give her, her share of inheritance from what Allah’s Apostle had left of the Fai (i.e. booty gained without fighting) which Allah had given him. Abu Bakr said to her, “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Our property will not be inherited, whatever we (i.e. prophets) leave is Sadaqa (to be used for charity).” Fatima, the daughter of Allah’s Apostle got angry and stopped speaking to Abu Bakr, and continued assuming that attitude till she died. Fatima remained alive for six months after the death of Allah’s Apostle.

She used to ask Abu Bakr for her share from the property of Allah’s Apostle which he left at Khaibar, and Fadak, and his property at Medina (devoted for charity). Abu Bakr refused to give her that property and said, “I will not leave anything Allah’s Apostle used to do, because I am afraid that if I left something from the Prophet’s tradition, then I would go astray.” (Later on) Umar gave the Prophet’s property (of Sadaqa) at Medina to ‘Ali and ‘Abbas, but he withheld the properties of Khaibar and Fadak in his custody and said, “These two properties are the Sadaqa which Allah’s Apostle used to use for his expenditures and urgent needs. Now their management is to be entrusted to the ruler.” (Az-Zuhrl said, “They have been managed in this way till today.”)

2. Muslim :: Book 19 : Hadith 4354

It has been narrated by ‘Urwa b Zubair on the authority of ‘A’isha, wife of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him), that Fatima, daughter of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him), requested Abu Bakr, after the death of the Messenger of Allah (may peace he upon him), that he should set apart her share from what the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) had left from the properties that God had bestowed upon him. Abu Bakr said to her: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be npon him) said:” We do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is Sadaqa (charity).” The narrator said: She (Fatima) lived six months after the death of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) and she used to demand from Abu Bakr her share from the legacy of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) from Khaibar, Fadak and his charitable endowments at Medina. Abu Bakr refused to give her this, and said: I am not going to give up doing anything which the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) used to do. I am afraid that it I go against his instructions in any matter I shall deviate from the right course. So far as the charitable endowments at Medina were concerned, ‘Umar handed them over to ‘All and Abbas, but ‘Ali got the better of him (and kept the property under his exclusive possession). And as far as Khaibar and Fadak were concerned ‘Umar kept them with him, and said: These are the endowments of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) (to the Umma). Their income was spent on the discharge of the responsibilities that devolved upon him on the emergencies he had to meet. And their management was to be in the hands of one who managed the affairs (of the Islamic State). The narrator said: They have been managed as such up to this day.

3. Bukhari :: Book 57 :: Volume 5 :: Hadith 60

Narrated ‘Aisha: Fatima sent somebody to Abu Bakr asking him to give her her inheritance from the Prophet from what Allah had given to His Apostle through Fai (i.e. booty gained without fighting). She asked for the Sadaqa (i.e. wealth assigned for charitable purposes) of the Prophet at Medina, and Fadak, and what remained of the Khumus (i.e., one-fifth) of the Khaibar booty. Abu Bakr said, “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘We (Prophets), our property is not inherited, and whatever we leave is Sadaqa, but Muhammad’s Family can eat from this property, i.e. Allah’s property, but they have no right to take more than the food they need.’ By Allah! I will not bring any change in dealing with the Sadaqa of the Prophet (and will keep them) as they used to be observed in his (i.e. the Prophet’s) life-time, and I will dispose with it as Allah’s Apostle used to do,” Then ‘Ali said, “I testify that None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, and that Muhammad is His Apostle,” and added, “O Abu Bakr! We acknowledge your superiority.” Then he (i.e. ‘Ali) mentioned their own relationship to Allah’s Apostle and their right. Abu Bakr then spoke saying, “By Allah in Whose Hands my life is. I love to do good to the relatives of Allah’s Apostle rather than to my own relatives” Abu Bark added: Look at Muhammad through his family (i.e. if you are no good to his family you are not good to him).

4. Bukhari :: Book 59 :: Volume 5 :: Hadith 368

Narrated ‘Aisha: Fatima and Al’Abbas came to Abu Bakr, claiming their inheritance of the Prophet’s land of Fadak and his share from Khaibar. Abu Bakr said, “I heard the Prophet saying, ‘Our property is not inherited, and whatever we leave is to be given in charity. But the family of Muhammad can take their sustenance from this property.’ By Allah, I would love to do good to the Kith and kin of Allah’s Apostle rather than to my own Kith and kin.”

5. Bukhari :: Book 80 :: Volume 8 :: Hadith 718

Narrated ‘Aisha: Fatima and Al ‘Abbas came to Abu Bakr, seeking their share from the property of Allah’s Apostle and at that time, they were asking for their land at Fadak and their share from Khaibar. Abu Bakr said to them, ” I have heard from Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘Our property cannot be inherited, and whatever we leave is to be spent in charity, but the family of Muhammad may take their provisions from this property.” Abu Bakr added, “By Allah, I will not leave the procedure I saw Allah’s Apostle following during his lifetime concerning this property.” Therefore Fatima left Abu Bakr and did not speak to him till she died.

6. Dawud :: Book 19 : Hadith 2963

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin: Fatimah was demanding (the property of) sadaqah of the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) at Medina and Fadak, and what remained from the fifth of Khaybar. Aisha quoted AbuBakr as saying: The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: We are not inherited; whatever we leave is sadaqah. The family of Muhammad will eat from this property, that is, from the property of Allah. They will not take more then their sustenance.

7. Tirmidhi: 1614

جَاءَتْ فَاطِمَةُ إِلَى أَبِي بَكْرٍ فَقَالَتْ مَنْ يَرِثُكَ قَالَ أَهْلِي وَوَلَدِي قَالَتْ فَمَا لِي لَا أَرِثُ أَبِي
فَقَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ سمَِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَقُولُ لَا نُورَثُ وَلَكِنِّي أَعُولُ مَنْ
كَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَعُولُهُ وَأُنْفِقُ عَلَى مَنْ كَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ
عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يُنْفِقُ عَلَيْهِ

Sayyidina Abu Hurayrah (ra) reported that Sayyidiah Fatimah (ra) came to Sayyidina Abu Bakr (ra) and asked, “Who will inherit you?” He said, “My wife and my children.”
She asked, “Then, what is with me that I do not inherit my father?” So, Abu Bakr (SAW) said, “I had heard Allah’s Messenger (SAW) say : We are not inherited. But, I will support whom Allah’s Messenger.i used to support and I will provide whom he used to provide.

hadith is sahih according to sheikh albani.

8. Tirmidhi Hadith 1615:
Both of them reported from Muhammad ibn Umar, from Abu Salamah who from Abu Hurayrah [& in Ahmed 79]

& many more with almost same text with the addition that Ali[ra] buried Fatima[ra] secretly.

Now some points from SUNNI HADITH SCIENCE:

There is one terminology called Mudraj in Hadith sciences.

The word “anger” is only mentioned in the Hadith transmitted from Hazrat Aisha[ra]. It is not mentioned in the Hadith narrated from other companions like Hazrat Abu Huraira, Hazrat Um Hani, etc.

Further the hadith narrated from Hazrat Aisha is of two types, one type mentions the word “anger” while the other type does not mention “anger”. The hadith which mention the word “anger” are all narrated by Ibn Shahab Zehri [well known for his idraaj of statements].

Al-Zuhri make idraaj of statements into hadiths from time to time, yet, he does it mainly to explain it.
You can find many examples in a book by Al-Khateeb Al-Baghdaadi that gives examples of Mudraj statements.
Here is the most famous one that comes to mind.

أول ما بدئ بالرسول الوحي قالت: كان يتحنث في غار حراء والتحنث التعبد الليالي ذوات العدد
الراوي: عائشة المحدث: ابن عثيمين – المصدر: شرح النزهة لابن عثيمين – الصفحة أو الرقم: 208
خلاصة حكم المحدث: عبارة (والتحنث: التعبد) مدرجة من كلام الزهري تفسيرا للحديث

This means that after Hazrat Abu Bakr RA had mentioned the reason for not giving Hazrat Fatima RA the share in Fadak, the latter had become silent after being satisfied. The narrator equated “silence” to “anger” and added the words to the hadith [to explain it]. This is also known as Mudraj in Hadith sciences.

“An addition by a reporter to the text of the saying being narrated is termed mudraj (interpolated).

For example, al-Khatib relates via Abu Qattan and Shababah — Shu’bah — Muhammad b. Ziyad — Abu Hurairah — The Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace), who said, “Perform the ablution fully; woe to the heels from the Fire!”
Al-Khatib then remarks, “The statement, ‘Perform the ablution fully’ is made by Abu Hurairah, while the statement afterwards, ‘Woe to the heels from the Fire!’, is that of the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace). The distinction between the two is understood from the narration of al- Bukhari, who transmits the same hadith and quotes Abu Hurairah as saying, “Complete the ablution, for Abu ‘l-Qasim (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) said: ‘Woe to the heels from the Fire!’.”

[i.e. why we want each & every hadith on fadak issue to know the truth. & our HADITH SCIENCE is not joke as that of SHIA’s.]

Such an addition may be found in the beginning, in the middle, or at the end, often in explanation of a term used. Idraj (interpolation) is mostly found in the text, although a few examples show that such additions are found in the isnad as well, where the reporter grafts a part of one isnad into another.

A reporter found to be in the habit of intentional idraj is generally unacceptable and considered a liar. However, the traditionists are more lenient towards those reporters who may do so forgetfully or in order to explain a difficult word”.


Then why Ali[ra] buried her secretly:


Bukhari 2.339: Narrated Ibn `Abbas. A person died and Allah’s Apostle used to visit him. He died at night and (the people) buried him at night. In the morning they informed the Prophet (about his death). He said, “What prevented you from informing me?” They replied, “It was night and it was a dark night and so we disliked to trouble you.” The Prophet went to his grave and offered the (funeral) prayer.

Note: This could have been the very same reason for not troubling hz abu bakar(ra) but when later informed he offered the funeral prayer again.

The Shiite asked why was Fatima[ra] buried at night, I want to ask Why was the prophet PBUH buried at night? and why was Aisha[ra]buried at night and many others? You think it’s something strange that people be buried at night? think again.
Secondly women ask specifically to be buried at night because they don’t want anyone to see their bodies even in death and this is out of shyness.

Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah says in his Minaaj al Sunnah:

وكذلك ما ذكره من إيصائها أن تُدفن ليلا ولا يصلي عليها أحد منهم لا يحكيه عن فاطمة ويحتج به إلا رجل جاهل يطرق على فاطمة ما لا يليق بها

he was saying was that Fatimah didn’t request to not be prayed over by Abu Bakr and others.

& here are two reliable sound hadiths & sahih hadith which says Abu Bakr [ra] lead the funeral prayer of fatima [ra] & they both talked to each other:

a. صلى أبو بكر رضي الله عنه على فاطمة بنت رسول الله فكبر عليها أربعًا

Hammad narrate from Ibrahim Nakhi that Hz. Abu Bakr[ra] lead salah-e-Janaza of Bibi Fatima Bint Muhammad[ra] with four Takbeers [ Tabqaat(Ibn Saad) Vol 8, Page 16]

b. When Hz. Fatima[ra] died Hz. Abu Bakr[ra] and Hz. Umar[ra] came, Hz. Abu Bakr[ra] asked Hz. Ali[ra] to lead prayer, Hz.Ali[ra] declined and said in presence of Khalifa of RasoolAllah[saw] how can I. [ Ali Mutaqi Al Nahdi author of Kanzal Amaal Vol 6 page 318, narrated through Khatib from Baqir]

c. ماتت فاطمة بين المغرب والعشاء فحضرها أبو بكر وعمر وعثمان والزبير وعبد الرحمن بن عوف رضي الله عنهم، فلما وضعت ليصلي عليها، قال على: تقدم يا أبا بكر، قال أبو بكر رضي الله عنه: وأنت يا أبا الحسن؟ قال: نعم، فوالله لا يصلي عليها غيرك، فصلى عليها أبو بكر رضي الله عنه ودفنت ليلاً

Ali bin al Husein narrated: Hz. Fatima[ra] died betwen Maghrib and Isha so Hz. Abu Bakr[ra] and Hz. Umar[ra] And Uthman and Zubair and AbdulRahman bin Awf (raa) came, Hz. Ali said: Come forth ya Abu Bakr, then Abu Bakr[ra] asked Hz. Ali[ra]: What about you ya Abu al Hassan? Hz.Ali[ra] declined saying: yes by Allah no one but you prays on her, So Abu Bakr did and she was buried at night.
source: Mukhtasar Kitab al muwafaqah, has weakness in the Isnad and what is Sahih is that Ali prayed on her in Sahih Muslim #1759.

d. عن الشعبي أنه قال: (لما مرضت فاطمة أتاها أبو بكر الصديق فاستأذن عليها، فقال علي: يافاطمة هذا أبو بكر يستأذن عليك؟ فقالت: أتحب أن آذن له؟ قال: نعم، فأذنت له فدخل عليها يترضاها، فقال: والله ما تركت الدار والمال، والأهل والعشيرة، إلا إبتغاء مرضاة الله، ومرضاة رسوله، ومرضاتكم أهل البيت، ثم ترضاها حتى رضيت)- السنن الكبرى للبيهقي 6/301-

“When Fatima became ill, Abu Bakr came to her and asked for permission to enter. So Ali said, ‘O Fatima, this is Abu Bakr asking for permission to enter.’ She answerd, ‘Do you want me to give him permission?’ He said, ‘Yes.’ So she allowed him (to enter), and he came in seeking her pleasure, so he told her: ‘By Allah, I only left my home and property and my family seeking the pleasure of Allah and His Messenger and you, O Ahlel Bayt.’ So he talked to her until she was pleased with him.” (Sunan Al-Bayhaqi, vol 6, page 301)

This Hadith is narrated by Bayhaqi in al Sunan al Kubra (6:300-301) and Dala’il al-Nubuwwa (7:273-281) who said: “It is narrated with a good (hasan) chain.” Muhibb al Din al-Tabari cited it in al Riyad Al Nadira (2:96-97 #534) and Dhahabi in the Siyar (Ibid).

لما مرضت فاطمة أتاها أبو بكر الصديق فاستأذن عليها فقال علي يا فاطمة هذا أبو بكر يستأذن عليك فقالت أتحب أن آذن له قال نعم فأذنت له فدخل عليها يترضاها فقال والله ما تركت الدار والمال والأهل والعشيرة إلا ابتغاء مرضاة الله ومرضاة رسوله ومرضاتكم أهل البيت ثم ترضاها حتى رضيت

Al-Bayhaqi, Ibn Kathir, and Ibn Hajar all authenticate this hadith & Ibn Kathir states it as Sahih in his Al Bidayah and Ibn Hajar in his Fath Al Bari.

وقال ابن حجر: «وهو وإن كان مرسلاً فاسناده إلى الشعبي صحيح»- فتح الباري 6/202
Ibn hajar says : the mursal of Shuba [الشعبي] is sahih

So the hadith is sahih as a whole.

More points to ponder: For the sake of jahil layman shia’s: Lets suppose she was angry with Abu Bakr[ra].

But ahle-sunnah have sahih hadith that fatima[ra] talked to Abu Bakr[ra] & also pleased with him.

Now the question arises: she did not talk to Abu Bakr[ra] as stated in Bukhari by Aisha[ra], so it is the clear contradiction?

Answer: No, it is not a contradiction. It is said in Bukhari that she did not talk till she died. This means she did not talk about FADAK till she died because she was satisfied by the answer given by Abu Bakr[ra] afterwards.

Now still shia try to show that: No, she was angry, & whosoever angered her, angered the prophet & who soever angered prophet angered ALLAH.

Answer: We ahul-sunnah also have sahih hadith that Ali[ra] angered her. Did u saw any ahul-sunnah try to say on that issue that: Ali[ra] angered Fatima[ra] therefore Ali[ra] angered ALLAH? [nauzubillah]

But this slander is only raised by shia’s.

In any case if bil-Fardh Sayyidah Fatimah Radhi Allahu ‘anha did not stop being angry with Sayyidina Abu Bakr Radhi Allahu `anhu, this would reflect badly on Sayyidah Fatimah not on Abu Bakr. Rasoolullah Sallallahu `alyhi wa Sallam was angry with people who quarreled with Abu Bakr, even when it was Abu Bakr who was more at fault!

It is narrated in Sahih Bukhari, kitab ut-Tafseer:

سمعت ابا الدرداء يقول كانت بين ابي بكر وعمر محاورة فاغضب ابو بكر عمر فانصرف عنه عمر مغضبا فاتبعه ابو بكر يساله ان يستغفر له فلم يفعل حتى اغلق بابه في وجهه فاقبل ابو بكر الى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فقال ابو الدرداء ونحن عندهفقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم اما صاحبكم هذا فقد غامر قال وندم عمر على ما كان منه فاقبل حتى سلم وجلس الى النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وقص على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم الخبر قال ابو الدرداء وغضب رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وجعل ابو بكر يقول والله يا رسول الله لانا كنت اظلمفقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم هل انتم تاركون لي صاحبي هل انتم تاركون لي صاحبي اني قلت يا ايها الناس اني رسول الله اليكم جميعا فقلتم كذبت وقال ابو بكر صدقت

صحيح البخاري – کتاب التفسير

There was a dispute between Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, and Abu Bakr made Umar angry. So ‘Umar left angrily. Abu Bakr followed him, requesting him to ask forgiveness (of Allah) for him, but ‘Umar refused to do so and closed his door in Abu Bakr’s face. So Abu Bakr went to Allah’s Apostle while we were with him. Allah’s Apostle said, “This friend of yours must have quarrelled (with somebody).” In the meantime ‘Umar repented and felt sorry for what he had done, so he came, greeted (those who were present) and sat with the Prophet and related the story to him. Allah’s Apostle became angry and Abu Bakr started saying, “O Allah’s Apostle! By Allah, I was more at fault (than Umar).” Allah’s Apostle said, “Will you people not leave, for my sake, my companion? When I said, ‘O people I am sent to you all as the Apostle of Allah,’ you said, ‘You tell a lie.’ while Abu Bakr said, ‘You have spoken the truth .”

Note: This was a case where Abu Bakr Radhi Allahu `anhu was more at fault by his own admission and Rasoolullah Sallallahu `alyhi wa Sallam was still angry with the one who quarreled with him so what of a matter in which Abu Bakr as-Siddeeq Radhi Allahu `anhu was ruling correctly, according to the explicit Sunnah and the other person had a wrong opinion?

So certainly Sayyidah Fatimah Radhi Allahu `anhu cleared up the matter between her and Abu Bakr Radhi Allahu `anhu, as befits her high status. And most certainly she did not remain angry with her father’s closest friend and companion in this world, merely for the sake of worldly land and money.

I am really amused at my Shia brothers. The Prophet said, “Whoever angers Fatima angers me.” I am not rejecting this Hadith. Let us investigate the scopes of the hadith and the respective logical corollaries.

Scope 1. All-superceding injunction:

The scope of this hadith is unconditional and it supersedes other injunctions of Islam if they contradict this hadith. It is not applicable only in house-hold affairs or social affairs, it is also applicable in Political and Judicial affaires of the State. In this case some questions arise.

A. Who then belongs the supreme Authority: the Caliph (Abu Bakr) or Fatima, the Imam (Ali) or Fatima?

All individual Muslims are in same position in front of the Court of Justice except Fatima. Islam has given her this special position. What she asks for is to be handed over to her by the Caliph or the Judge without any farther investigation.

B. Is it a fundamental rule of Islamic jurisprudence?

The Shias are to give a clear answer to these questions.

Scope 2. A specific reaction of the Prophet:

This hadith deals with a specific event. The Prophet felt disturbed at hearing that Ali decided to marry Abu Jahl’s daughter and said such thing in response. In this case the Shias of Ali are to deal with their Imam first. It has no connection with Abu Bakr when he gives judicial verdict as a Caliph.

Scope 3. A general recommendation of a loving father:

Esteemed Fatima was a pious lady and the Prophet loved her much as a father. He felt sorry and pain when he found her in distress. He expressed his attitude. He did not mean by this that a Caliph or a Judge is also under this recommendation and that they are too listen to and obey her in all respect. If this is the case, Shia turmoil is utter nonsense.

Fadak in prophet’s era:

Did Fatima[ra] asked fadak during prophets life time?

The hadith from sunnan abi dawood; Kitab Al-Kharaj, Wal-Fai’ Wal-Imarah; hadith 2966

Narrated Umar ibn AbdulAziz:  Al-Mughirah (ibn Shu’bah) said: Umar ibn AbdulAziz gathered the family of Marwan when he was made caliph, and he said: Fadak belonged to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him), and he made contributions from it, showing repeated kindness to the poor of the Banu Hashim from it, and supplying from it the cost of marriage for those who were unmarried. Fatimah asked him to give it to her, but he refused. That is how matters stood during the lifetime of the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) till he passed on (i.e. died).
When AbuBakr was made ruler he administered it as the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) had done in his lifetime till he passed on. Then when Umar ibn al-Khattab was made ruler he administered it as they had done till he passed on. Then it was given to Marwan as a fief, and it afterwards came to Umar ibn AbdulAziz.
Umar ibn AbdulAziz said: I consider I have no right to something which the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) refused to Fatimah, and I call you to witness that I have restored it to its former condition; meaning in the time of the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him).

Comment: So we can see that during the lifetime of prophet S.A.W.; she also asked for fadak but prophet refused her & kept fadak for poor & needy. Umar Bin Abdul Aziz [ra] could have given fadak regarding any reason… could have been given as a gift!…. but he definitely did not give it to compensate because he thought Fatima [ra] was wronged…no way!

It is therefore concluded that Fadak was neither inheritance nor a gift. This was exactly the position of Imam ‘Ali. When he became the Khalifah he did not treat Fadak as the estate of his deceased wife Sayyidah Fatimah, by taking a quarter for himself and distributing the remaining three quarters between , Husayn and Umm Kulthum according to the rule “to the male twice the share of the female”. This is an established fact of history. Why is Abu Bakr execrated for something which was also done by ‘Ali? In fact, Sayyid Murtada (known as ‘Alam al-Huda) narrates in his book on Imamah entitled ash-Shafi, that when ‘Ali became the khalifah he was approached about returning Fadak. His reply was:

I am ashamed before Allah to overturn something that was prohibited by Abu Bakr and continued by ‘Umar.” (al-Murtada, ash-Shafi fil-Imamah, p. 231; and Ibn Abil Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah, vol. 4)

According to both Sunni and Shia narrations, Hadrat Abu Bakr (radhiallahu anhu) was greatly saddened by the developments and by Hadrat Fatima’s displeasure. He went to great lengths to please her while remaining firm on the Shariah. He went to her home, stood at her door in the midday sun and asked Hadrat Ali (radhiallahu anhu) to be his intercessor in his sincere attempt to placate and please Hadrat Fatima (radhiallahu anha). Ultimately she became pleased with him and accepted his decision. These narrations appear in Madaarijun Nubuwwah, Kitaabul Wafaa, Baihaqi and in the commentaries of Mishkaat (all authoritative Kitaabs of the Ahlus Sunnah).

Kitaabul Muwaafiqah narrates that Anaani said:

“ Abu Bakr (radhiallahu anhu) came to the door of Fatima (radhiallahu anha) in the midday sun and said: ‘I shall not leave from here as long as the daughter of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) remains displeased with me. Hadrat Ali (radhiallahu anhu) came to Fatima (radhiallahu anha) and giving her an oath urged her to become pleased. Then she became pleased (with Hadrat Abu Bakr).”

Further narrations state: [as quoted above]

When Hadrat Fatima (radhiallahu anha) fell sick Abu Bakr Siddiq (radhiallahu anhu) came and asked permission to see her.

Ali said: “Fatima, here is Abu Bakr asking permission to see you.” She said: “Would you like me to give him permission?” (Al-Dhahabi said in the Siyar (Al Arna’ut ed. 2:121): “She applied the Sunna by not giving permission to anyone to enter her husbands house except by his command.”)

He said yes, whereupon she gave him permission. He entered to see her, seeking her good pleasure, and said: “By Allah! I did not leave my house, property, family, and tribe except to please Allah, and to please His Prophet, and to please you, the People of the House (ahl al bayt)! He continued to seek her good pleasure until she was pleased.” [*]

أخبرنا أبو عبد الله الحافظ ثنا أبو عبد الله محمد بن يعقوب الحافظ ثنا محمد بن عبد الوهاب ثنا عبدان بن عثمان العتكي بنيسابور ثنا أبو ضمرة عن إسماعيل بن أبي خالد عن الشعبي قال ثم لما مرضت فاطمة رضي الله عنها أتاها أبو بكر الصديق رضي الله عنه فاستأذن عليها فقال علي رضي الله عنه يا فاطمة هذا أبو بكر يستأذن عليك فقالت أتحب أن آذن له قال نعم فأذنت له فدخل عليها يترضاها وقال والله ما تركت الدار والمال والأهل والعشيرة إلا ابتغاء مرضاة الله ومرضاة رسوله ومرضاتكم أهل البيت ثم ترضاها حتى رضيت

[*] Bayhaqi (rahimullah) in al Sunan al Kubra (6:300-301) and Dala’il al-Nubuwwa (7:273-281) who said: “It is narrated with a fair (hasan) chain.”

Muhibb al Din al-Tabari (rahimullah) cited it in al Riyad Al Nadira (2:96-97 #534) and Dhahabi (rahimullah)in the Siyar (Ibid).

Ibn Kathir (rahimullah) states it as Sahih in his Al Bidayah and Ibn Hajar (rahimullah) in his Fath Al Bari.

Shia records also confirm that Hadrat Fatima (radhiallahu anha) became pleased with Hadrat Abu Bakr (radhiallahu anhu).

Ibn-i-Mitham writes in the context of interpreting Nahj-ul-Balaga: “Abu Bakr said to Fatima: Whatever belonged to your father, belongs to you as well. The Messenger of Allah kept something apart out of his personal share (fadak) and distributed the rest of it in the name of Allah. By Allah, I’ll do with you what he used to do with you. Fatima was pleased to hear these words, a confirmation of the Prophetic practice” { Ibn-i-Mitham al-Buhrani, Sharh Nahj-ul-Balaga, Vol.5, P. 107,109 , Tehran }

” إن أبا بكر قال لها : إن لك ما لأبيك ، كان رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله يأخذ من فدك قوتكم ، ويقسم الباقي ويحمل منه في سبيل الله ، ولك على الله أن أصنع بها كما كان يصنع ، فرضيت بذلك وأخذت العهد عليه به

The Imaamiyyah Shia author of Hujjaajus Saalikeen states:

“Verily, when Abu Bakr saw that Fatima was annoyed with him, shunned him and did not speak to him after this on the issue of Fadak, he was much aggrieved on account of this. He resolved to please her. He went to her and said: ‘ Oh daughter of Rasulullah! You have spoken the truth in what you have claimed, but I saw Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) distributing it (i.e. the income of Fadak). He would give it to the Fuqaraa, Masaakeen and wayfarers after he gave your expenses and expenses of the workers.’ She then said:’ Do with it as my father, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had done.’ Abu Bakr said:’ I take an oath by Allah for you! It is incumbent on me to do with it what your father used do with it.’ Fatima said: ‘ By Allah! You should most certainly do so.’ Abu Bakr said: ‘ By Allah! I shall most certainly do so.’ Fatima said: ‘ O Allah! Be witness.’ Thus, she became pleased with this and she took a pledge from Abu Bakr. Abu Bakr would give them ( Fatima and others of the Ahl-e-Bait) expenses there from and distribute the balance to the Fuqaraa, Masaakeen and wayfarers.”

Comment: This narration is also in other books of the Imaamiyyah Shias. It confirms that Hadrat Abu Bakr (radhiallahu anhu) believed that Hadrat Fatima (radhiallahu anha) was truthful in her claim, but the practice of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) convinced him that ownership was not given to Hadrat Fatima (radhiallahu anha). The accusation against Hadrat Abu Bakr (radhiallahu anhu) is therefore pure slander.

Final wordings: 1. And Hafiz ibn Hajar said:

وَنَقَلَ الْبَيْهَقِيُّ فِي ” الِاعْتِقَاد ” بِسَنَدِهِ إِلَى أَبِي ثَوْر عَنْ الشَّافِعِيّ أَنَّهُ قَالَ : أَجْمَعَ الصَّحَابَة وَأَتْبَاعهمْ عَلَى أَفْضَلِيَّة أَبِي بَكْر ثُمَّ عُمَر ثُمَّ عُثْمَان ثُمَّ عَلِيّ.

“Imam Baiqhi narrated in his al-Aitiqad that Imam Shafi  said that there is Ijma of Sahabas and Tabieen on the superiority of Hazrat Abu Bakar [ra] , then Umar [ra] , then Usman [ra] and then Ali [ra] .”

Comment: The three Sahabas mentioneda bove, accroding to Shias they forced to give bayat/snatched fadak/broke rib of fatima[ra]/burned the house/etc. etc.

I can assure that you will never be able to provide any authentic references to back up your claim.

And what is the ruling of Ahle Sunnah regarding a person who goes against this Ijma?

2. Hafiz ibn Katheer  in “Bidaya wal Nihaya” vol 7, chapter “شيء من فضائل أمير المؤمنين علي بن أبي طالب” wrote:

وقد ثبت عنه بالتواتر أنه قال على منبر الكوفة‏:‏ أيها الناس‏!‏ إن خير هذه الأمة بعد نبيها أبو بكر ثم عمر، ولو شئت أن أسمي الثالث لسميت‏

“And it’s proven from him [Ali] in “tawatur” form, that He said on the minbaar in Kufa: “O people! The best one in this Ummah after her Prophet is Abu Bakr [ra] , then Umar [ra] . And if I wanted to say you the third name, I would do that.”

So what is the ruling of denying tawatur? Few weak and gharib narrations or narrations took out of context can’t over rule tawatur and Ijma.

3. Hafiz ibn Hajr quotes Hazrat Ali [ra] :

ولا يبلغني عن أحد يفضلني عليهما إلا جلدته حد المفتري

“I will lash anyone who prefers me over Abu Bakr and Umar, the lashing of a slanderer.”

[Lisan al-Mizan, Vol. III P. 290]

contributed by RajabMohsin, ahlussunnah, tripolysunni, ibn ahmed & others.


Filed under Articles, Clarification about sunni hadiths, Rebuttals

126 responses to “Fadak: Truth Vs Falsehood

    • Ahmed Omar

      Assalamu Alykum I am a Sunni Muslim this topic has a lot of contradictions & my biggest problem is to understand WAS FATUMA DAUGHTER OF THE PROPHET & WIFE OF SYDNA ALI ASKING TO BE GIVEN WHAT SHE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO ? IS THIS ISSUE NOT TELLING THAT THE PROPHET FAILED TO TEACH HIS FAMILY PROPERLY SUCH THAT HIS DAUGHTER WOULD GO (SEVERALLY) ASK TO BE GIVEN LAND WHICH DID NOT BELONG TO HER ? We all know according to our Prophet Syna Ali was baabu Ilm, how could Ali not dissuade his wife not to go ask for the land which did not belong to her ? was Ali’s religious knowledge mentioned by the Prophet fake ? Translations & commentaries of soo many Ulamaa’s are personal opinions as far as the entire topic is concerned hence various interpretations by different scholars, My view we don’t have to call Shia’s names because they have their version just like how we Sunni’s our scholars have divergent opinions. As for Fatuma being buried at night THAT also brings another subject WHAT IS THE TRUTH ? was she buried at night by 6 people & she had instructed her death not to be communicated to Synda Abubakar ? WE HAVE TO KNOW THAT THESE WERE NO ORDINARY PEOPLE ONE IS A BELOVED DAUGHTER OF THE PROPHET & TGHE OTHER A KHALIFA WHO CAME AFTER THE PROPHET, THEIR DIFFERENCES IS NO SIMPLE BLAME GAME FOR THE UMMA, THEIR DARJA MUST BE THE PROPER BENCH MARK TO GIVE A CORRECT ANSWER TO WHAT TOOK PLACE.
      Which is the truth she stopped talking to Abubakar after he refused to give the land till her death ? Different translations has been given, leaving the Umma to have choice BUT WHAT WAS THE TRUTH ?

  1. Abdullah

    Sunni are wrong Shias are right, thats the truth, Watch when Imam Mahdi a.s. comes,

    • Ashar Pervez

      So this is your reply after reading such a detailed post?

      • Ahmed

        What detailed post?? You write all you want and lie to yourself however much you like brother.. The Daughter Allah’s Apostle was hurt in everyway possible and was sad.. She remained alive 6 months after our beloved Nabi.
        Before you run with all the hadiths in Sunni books.. remember that many hadiths considered sahih in all them books attack our beloved Nabi, Amirul Mu’mineen.. Don’t forget that Ali bin Abi talib was cursed by bany Umayyahs for decades and decades.. So many hadith Praising Abu bakr, Umar and Uthman that are obvious fabrications..
        If you are a true muslim you would look into the ahlul bayt’s side of the story..
        You can see that Amir Ali was hated by many sahaba.. lets make the story short. Hadith: Nabi Mohamed (sawa) said: Only a believer love Ali and only a hypocrite hates Ali. “briefly everyone who ever hated Amirul Mu’mineen was a Munafaaq (hypocrite)” when there during the time of sahaba, tabiciin, salaf and today.
        Walahi I was a sunni until 6 months ago.. I read every hadith in bukhari, muslim and the other 4 books of hadith.
        Again, we will see who are on the truth when the Mahdi comes!

      • Muhammad

        No this is the reply
        1۔ What is the Proof of Idraaj in the hadith quoted in bukhari by Ayesha (r.a)? Two hadith narrated by Aisha have no proof of idraaj. However, there is one hadith (6276) where narrater is not mentioned in start and end is mentioned word (قال) which indicates narrater is man not Hazrat Ayesha. In this hadith it is also mentioned that Sayyida Fatima (s.a) got incensed (خفا).
        2. In life she was angry at him and that is why she made wasiah (according to shia reports) not to inform Hazrat Abu Bakar and Hazrat Umar. So he buried him secretly and it makes sense because she was angry. If someone wants to seek truth, then he must read shia ahadith and then analyse. Of course if you are going to read only one school of thought then you will always side that one whether it be Hindu, Jew, Christian and whatever.
        3. Prophet (pbuh) was buried three days after death as mentioned in some reports. Try not mix different things together. No doubt many are buried at night but there is a problem over here that Hazrat Ali even did not inform about her death even though she died in day time. Here you got to take help from shia reports as they are very strict regarding births and deaths of 14 infallibles no matter you are sunni or shia. It is mentioned in their reports that Fatima (s.a) died in daytime._
        4. It is mentioned both in bukhari and muslim that she was buried secretly and Ali (a.s) prayed on her. These two are most authentic books and superior to other books sunni books where it is mentioned that Abu Bakar prayed on her. So references from other books cannot negate ahadith mentioned in bukhari and muslim. Come on reply to this, if you can. Don’t beat around bushes giving references from other less worthy books.
        5. What the hell this in this it is mentioned she got angry, did not meet him and did not till her death which clearly shows that she was angry that’s why she did not talk with him. Where hell it is mentioned in sahih bukhari and sahih muslim that she did not talk about Fidak. Don’t be so blind and behave not like Jews and Christian giving your own explanation and interpretation. If you read ahadith impartially no doubt it sounds right that she was angry that’s why she did not talk with her.
        6. We have no say in Quran and Hadith. If prophet has said that “whosoever makes her angry, makes me angry” then let it be any one whether it be Ali (a.s) or any other human being hadith is applicable on him/her. If you have sahih hadith then come on apply it on Ali (a.s)? Have you got ther courage to do so? Shias have got the courage to follow Allah first, then prophet and then Imams. Shias clearly say that whosoever went against 14 infallibles will go to hell and history tells that Imam Raza’s brother and Imam Mehdi’s brother went against their brothers. So wo don’t respect such men.
        As far as Ali (a.s) and Fatima (s.a) are concerned then you got refer to Shia Hadith in which Hazrat Ali (a.s) says “By God! We (me and Fatima) never got angry on each other. Again I will recall that it makes sense they were example for the whole humanity. The Sahih Hadith according to Ahl-ul-Sunnah states that Fatima (s.a) got angry because Hazrat Ali (a.s) wanted to marry daughter of Abu-Jahl? Isn’t that disrespect for Fatima (s.a) the she got angry on what was allowed by Allah? Furthermore, it states that Prophet still sided with Hazrat Fatima (s.a) because Abu Jahl was enemy of god. So, he didn’t want be her together with Fatima (s.a). Does it makes sense that prophet would do that knowing that he himself married daughter of Abu Sufyan while
        he was biggest enemy of God at that time? Isn’t that disrespect for the prophet that show that prophets actions were against his sayings? Please try to realize that prophet always strictly went against what was against Islam.
        7. Try not support your opinion through your own sources. Come on man Prophet has only said about Sayyida Fatima (s.a) that whosoever makes her angry…… whosoever, whosoever, whosoever, whosoever whosoever…… not about anyone else.
        8. Try not be so bold when you know nothing. Please refer to books see that she also presented Ali (a.s), Um-e-Aiman, Hassan and Hussain as witness who are Ameers of Jannah. Go through the history and recall the instances when some reliable sahaba were given what they wanted without any witness. E.g. instance of Hazrat Umar and Abdullah bin Jabir Ansari.
        Furthermore, try to realize that in whole discussion you were talking about inheritance. Suppose if my father died left some booty. So, if I someone to give me that because it belonged to my father, does it need any witness? Abu Bakar accepted that Fadak belonged to prophet and but purposed his own hadith to refrain from giving it her.
        9. Is this Islam that everyone has right to benefit, everyone whether it be sinful, but offspring of those who sacrifice their whole life for God got no such right? Whether Allah is oppressor? Some can put question mark on such Islam?
        10. Again you are misinterpreting Hadith. Try not give your own explanation the hadith of prophet regarding Fatima (s.a) in which may put your school of thought at stake. Try to read your own books and understand what does it mean.
        11. Again you have started quoting hadiths from your own sources, and from sources that are not well authentic among shias. Shias are on same page regarding fadak. Come on give reference from most authentic sources.
        Waiting for any reply for your or mine guidance towards right path.

      • Syed Muhammad Ibn Afaq al-Deobandi

        After referring to 15 different works of Hadith and history, I found 36 narrations with the mention of Sayyidah Fatimah’s (RA) question for what she initially understood as her right from Abu Bakr (RA). 11 of those 36 that are narrated from companions other than Aisha (RA) and do not involve Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri as a narrator. None of those 11 has any word about the anger of Sayyidah Fatimah (RA). Out of the 25 that come from ‘Aisha (RA) through al-Zuhri alone, 9 are such that have no indication of the kind either. The remaining 16 do have the words under consideration but as said all these come through one narrator Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri. Out of these 16, there are 6 that clearly have the قال i.e. “He said” thing mentioned above. SO THIS IDRAAJ IS TRUE.

      • Syed Muhammad Ibn Afaq al-Deobandi


        1. After referring to 15 different works of Hadith and history, I found 36 narrations with the mention of Sayyidah Fatimah’s (RA) question for what she initially understood as her right from Abu Bakr (RA). 11 of those 36 that are narrated from companions other than Aisha (RA) and do not involve Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri as a narrator. None of those 11 has any word about the anger of Sayyidah Fatimah (RA). Out of the 25 that come from ‘Aisha (RA) through al-Zuhri alone, 9 are such that have no indication of the kind either. The remaining 16 do have the words under consideration but as said all these come through one narrator Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri. Out of these 16, there are 6 that clearly have the قال i.e. “He said” thing mentioned above. SO THIS IDRAAJ IS TRUE.

        2. Can you please quote a valid hadith to prove this point. Yes, Sunni books mention it. But its Sanad is not proven. Show a Sahih Sanad FREE OF IDRAAJ.

        3. You should show references to prove your claims. You have no shown any reference.

        4. Yes, it IS mentioned in BUKHARI. But, again this was from the narration of al-Zuhri, and due to it, it was probably an IDRAAJ too.

        5. All the narration that mention that she did not talk till her death are from al-Zuhri. I have already mentioned.

        6. This is ridiculous. You said: “Isn’t that disrespect for Fatima (s.a) the she got angry on what was allowed by Allah?” I hope that also applies in the case of Fadak. Fadak was from al-Fai. and al-Fai is not the property of anyone but it is the property of government. Why Fatima asked al-Fai if it is not the personal property of anyone. Isn’t that disrespect for Fatima?

        7, 8 , 9 , 10. There are a lot of Shi’i sources on al-Fadak. A can prove the sources from Shia that suppot your theory of Fadak to be weak according to Shi’i methodology too.
        For Example, there is a Hadith in your Shi’i sources:

        حدثنا علي بن الحسين بن شاذويه المؤدب؛ وجعفر بن محمد بن مسرور رضي الله عنه، قالا: حدثنا محمد بن عبد الله بن جعفر الحميري، عن أبيه، عن الريان بن الصلت، قال: حَضَرَ الرِّضَا عليه السلام

        Ali ibn Al-Hussein ibn Shazawayh al-Mo’addib and Ja’far ibn Muhammad ibn Masroor – May God Be Pleased with Them – narrated that Muhammad ibn Abdullah ibn Ja’far al-Himyari quoted on the authority of his father, on the authority of al-Ryan ibn al-Salt : Imam Reza (as) says about the above ayat that: And render to the kindred their due rights…’[bani israeel, 26]

        When this verse was revealed to the Prophet (s), he summoned his daughter (the Blessed Lady) Fatima (s). Fatima (s) said, “O Prophet of God! Yes.” The Prophet (s) said:“Fadak is one of the territories that we did not exhaust our horses or camels to seize. Therefore, it is exclusively mine and not the Muslims Now, I will donate it to you and your offspring as a gift according to God’s instructions.”

        Source: Ayoon Akhbar ar Reza, vol 1, chapter 23, imam raza’s asws debate with mamoon regarding differences between itraat and ummat, page 220-240. and Amali Sheikh Sudooq, 79th gathering, hadeeth 1

        THIS REPORT IS WEAK because narrators Ali ibn Al-Hussein ibn Shazawayh al-Mo’addib and Ja’far ibn Muhammad ibn Masroor both are Majhool(anonymous), as per Al-Khoei‘s book, Mu’jam Rijal Al-Hadith.

      • Nasir Mirab

        Dear Brother I read the under mentioned and I love the honestly of the person writing the same may allah forgive all his sins.

        I’m a follower of the Shafii school of thought. The fact is Umar abdul Aziz returned Fadak to ahlul Bayt openly stating Fadak belongs to Ahlul bayt. He also stopped the cursing of sayidina Ali from the mimbar.Hiding facts from us Muslim will never end this confusion . Mistakes were done .They are not maasum . Its okay . The more we hide and twist the facts the more Infallible you make Abu Bakar/ Umar appear .

  2. Abdullahi Lamido

    Thanks fo this excellent post

  3. agha khalid mansoor

    thanx for the detail and comrehensive solution for this so called confussion that arises from ill mannered shia aalims.

  4. Ali hussain

    for the sake of argument…yeah hazrat abu baker(r.a) did all that and bibi fatima(r.a) didn’t like what he did..who the hell you are to decide who is right and wrong..have you people granted with any spiritual power?you know who have written letters to hazret imam hussain(r.a) and who have did all this..and who are beating their selves…

    • Syed Mubbashir hussain

      hahahahahhahaha…. ALi hussain i salute your thinking… the world is running too fast but Just u are still there where your stupid ancestor were… sooo sad….

  5. Syed Mubbashir hussain

    Just tell me why not Bibi Fatimah (A.S) didn’t have there Bagh-e-fadak. and your Riwayat is fake.. becoz in Quran majid in many Nabi Ask to there inheritance… if u want refrences i can give u….

  6. Humayun Farooqui

    Abu Bakar was a lier

    • warda

      you have left islam if you say anything against as saddiq the truthful. the most beloved one of the prophet s.a.w

    • Defender of Haq

      Allah’s wrath and curse be fall on any one who slanders Abu Bakr Siddique.

    • szakria

      What to say to a sick mind who say liar to the person whom Rasullah S. A. A. W. said Saddique. He is laying by side of our beloved prophet and on the day of resurrection with see the face of Rasullah S.A.A.W.
      But, unfortunately you can’t see the realities on ground

  7. faiq

    Sura 42,Verse 23

    “Say O Muhammad to mankind: ‘No reward do I ask of you for this except the love of those near of kin.’ ”
    According to Traditions, when the holy Prophet was asked as to who were the relatives alluded to in the verse, the holy Prophet said, “Verily, the reference is to Ali, Fatima, Hasan and Hussain.”

    • Ash-Shûra 42:23. “That is (the Paradise) whereof Allâh gives glad tidings to His slaves who believe (in the Oneness of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism) and do righteous good deeds. Say (O Muhammad SAW): “No reward do I ask of you for this except to be kind to me for my kinship with you.” And whoever earns a good righteous deed, We shall give him an increase of good in respect thereof. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Ready to appreciate (the deeds of those who are obedient to Him).”
      If you lie about the Quran Al Kareem you will be caught red-handed… Please be aware Faiq.

  8. ali hyder

    these ahl e sunnat waj jamat are sumun bukmun umiun fahum la yarjeon. prophet told them that after me ALI will b ur leader but these hungry dogs left ahle bait for just the wealth and power shame on u
    who defend these bloody dogs killer of sayyada fatima s.a how will u answer holy prophet on the day of justice?

    • Learn some manners before talking about Islam (I know the school of Kulaini and Majlisi teaches you the insults).

      Prophet (saw) never appointed anyone as his successor. The first person who made this claim was Abdullah ibn Saba.

      How will you answer the Prophet (saw) when you are following opposite of what He (saw) preached.

      Tell me what wealth did Abubakr (ra) and Umar (ra) gain? They lived the most simple life, they didn’t appoint their sons after them. They died and left no wealth.

      • Shi'a ne ALI

        Hahahaha they gain enough fame and legacy and they are the reason you Ahle sunnah are mis guided…When you all say believe in our Hadith its authentic,ok fine now your Hadith is quoting that abu baqr had snatched bagh e fidak..when Allah swt says in sure al hasr verse number 7:
        مَّا أَفَاءَ اللَّهُ عَلَىٰ رَسُولِهِ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْقُرَىٰ فَلِلَّهِ وَلِلرَّسُولِ وَلِذِي الْقُرْبَىٰ وَالْيَتَامَىٰ وَالْمَسَاكِينِ وَابْنِ السَّبِيلِ كَيْ لَا يَكُونَ دُولَةً بَيْنَ الْأَغْنِيَاءِ مِنكُمْ ۚ وَمَا آتَاكُمُ الرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ وَمَا نَهَاكُمْ عَنْهُ فَانتَهُوا ۚ وَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ ۖ إِنَّ اللَّهَ شَدِيدُ الْعِقَابِ
        That a part of bagh e fidak belongs to Allah’s apostle daughter….Believe me you’ll have been misguided

    • M. Tomawis

      ali hyder, you’re really deaf, dumb and blind; you can read but can’t understand. Try to learn more without putting hatred in your heart and ask forgiveness from Allah and Allah may guide you to the right path.

    • szakria

      Dear brother this verse in for the people like you ” sumun bukmun umiun fahum la yarjeon” because you forgot all what our beloved prophet said. would you tell us where Ali R.A. was when Rasullah S.A.A.W. asked Abu Bakar R.A. to do amamt of Namaz? Why he did not gave this responsibility to Ali R.A.? Why Hazrat Ali took accepted Khilafat of Abu Bakar and Umar R.A.? why he did not declared his unhappiness? why he accepted khilafat of Usman R.A.? why Hazrat Hassan and Hussain R.A. was taking care of Usman R.A.’s house at the time of his Shahdat. Ali R.A. was there giving instructions to his son Hazrat Hassan and Hussain. What were the names of Hazarat Ali’s sons and grandsons Abu Bakar, Umar Usman. What was the real name of Ali Asghar and Ali Akbar? who gave them this name of Ali Asghar and Ali Akbar?

      Allah ap ko hadayat dy deen-e-Mohammedi ki (Ameen)

    • Ali Hyder; get your proof if you are truthful indeed…

  9. shhh

    The religion wasn’t complete until the prophet named his Successor at ghadir .. & this is according to sunni scholars :-/


    REASON: Copying long articles from Shia websites. ### ]

    I was only meant to write a line or two but flippin eck when it comes to the truth i get carried away .. lol

    At the very least you have to accept that the views of the shia are not unfounded and are perfectly understandable, the rest is between you and Allah (swt).


  10. Ali

    You claim that the Prophet, Aisha etc were buried at NIGHT. Alright fair enough but how comes you know where their graves are and not Hazrat Fatima? Doesn’t that imply that she was buried in SECRET because she did not talk to Abu Bakr and Umar after what they did to her which is narrated clearly in sahih-Bukhari. And it is narrated that she didn’t talk to them which is why she wanted to be buried at night. Theres a difference between wanting to be buried at night and being buried at night.

  11. The Truth

    They say .. When you tell one lie .. You usually have to tell another to cover it ,
    Noo wonder your post is sooo long.

    Your so called Hadith system is a joke,you take silly Hadith over Quran .. Allah tells us in Quran that Prophets DO leave inheritance .. But your made up Hadith attribute lies to the prophet by claiming he said prophets don’t leave inheritance …Lol what a joke!
    Why do u worship dodgy Hadith over Quran?
    Why do u worship sahaba soo much that u ignore Quran just to defend your sahaba gods?

    I can’t even be bothered with the rest of your POOR effort to defend the accused

      • The Truth

        Poor poor effort,one that only goes on to confirm what I have already said.

        AGAIN you use Hadith to override the Holy Quran,and what is worse .. You start manipulating the point at hand .. DID PROPHETS LEAVE INHERITANCE?? 

        THE QURAN SAYS YES – Abu Bakr says no.

        The details of what is left in inheritance isn’t the question,and nor is it relevant in this case .. the question is simply Do the prophets leave inheritance or not.

        And you conviently ignored the Quran ayat where it says ‘And give to the next of kin..’ .. Upon which Our Prophet GIFTED the land of Fadak to Fatimah (sa) .. Confirmed in Sunni Hadith .

        Again the article you directed me to just like the above article is more lies and deception that really don’t show your version in a good light.

      • It seems you haven’t read this article and the link I shared with you. Both answer your claims.

        If you want to discuss the matter in detail please join this Shia-Sunni discussion Forum:

      • The Truth

        I have checked the link you sent,Wayyy too many mistakes and contradictions.

        I don’t know why you have a problem with the truth but until learn to accept reality there will be no progress .

      • ali

        All the Sunni commentators while explaining the 28th verse of Surah Bani Israel state that the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h) had gifted Fadak to Janabe Fatima Zahra (p.b.u.h). Thus, automatically it becomes the personal property of Hazrat Fatima Zahra (p.b.u.h). Just to prove our point, the following books may be referred to: Suyooti’s ‘Durrul Mansoor’, vol. 5, p.273; Hakim-e-Haskani’s ‘Shawaahed ut-Tanzeel’, vol. 1, p.240. Both these authors have quoted from Abu Saeed Khudri and Ibn Abbas. Also, the following learned men have explained and confessed that the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h) has gifted Fadak to Fatima Zahra (p.b.u.h): Qazi Abdul Jabbar Motazali, Yaqoote Hammui, Ibn Abil Hadeed, Abdul Fattah Abdul Maqsood-e-Misri, etc

      • Stop lying. You and your scholars live your lives with lies. The report attributed to Ibn Abbas and Abu Saeed al-Khudri is a fabrication.

    • Listen carefully, and be not amongst the rejecters, When Bibi Fatima R.a asked for the Fadak with the Nabi Kareem s.a.w he promptly rejected her request as Fadak not being her inheritance. Same was done by Abu Bakr Al Siddique R.a and Omar Farook R.a and even Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.a did the same after she had passed away. Now, don’t bang your heads on a dead wall, read the article in full and learn.

  12. Ali da malang

    Messenger of Allah (may peace he upon him) also said that Fatima (A.S) is the leader of women from Jannah. Now think if she was asking for false claim then it will make her a liar ( Naozbillah).
    Will any liar to go heaven and specially be leader of the all the pious women of the jannah.
    For me there only liar here were Abu Bakar and his companions.

    • This is how Shia understand narrations with their twisted mentality.

      It is not about who was a ‘liar’ and who was a ‘truthful’. It is about whose opinion was strong and who was mistaken. In the matter of Fadak Abubakr’s (ra) opinion was correct and Fatima (ra) was mistaken. No One is infallible. This is the truth. You shia consider Fatima (ra) to be infallible person who is never wrong and consider Abubakr to the ‘evil’ person who is always ‘wrong’. This is how Shia approach these issues, a close minded, one sided, biased approach.

      • Ali da malang

        Our approach is not biased but how about your approach. It seems that all the support is going towards Abu Bakar and his companions.Twist and turn the hadiyah just to support their false act. Sunnis are inclined towards them more then Prophet (peace he upon him) himself.
        If they were not evil then why did they conspired against prophet family after his demise. They left Rasool (peace he upon him) burial to join sakeefa (Plot of conspiracy).
        It is clear they were interested in acquiring power then his burial and you call those persons loving followers. For them acquiring power was the priority.
        As a Muslim we should have complete faith on what Prophet (peace he upon him) said. When he says that Fatima is from Jannah we believe it. She wont say wrong things or do any wrong doings in any matter. This is enough for one who believes in his sayings and how strong is faith towards Quran and Rasool (peace he upon him).
        Clearly Abu bakar and his companions were conspirators from the first day and had no faith in Rasool (peace he upon him).

      • Typical Shia.

        Jumping from one topic to another.

    • szakria

      LOL. Messenger of Allah (may peace he upon him) declared Abu Bakar top in Ashra Mubashra. Can Messenger of Allah (may peace he upon him) say such a thing about a liar???????

    • The Nabi Kareem S.a.w also said, that one who displeases Fatima R.a displeases The Nabi and he who displeases the Nabi had displeased Allah s.w.t … so read the article carefully and be not among the rejectors of truth.

  13. sajid

    MA sha ALLAH ❤ ❤ …! MA sha ALLAH ..!! (: ..! OutClass Work Brother …!

    ADmin May ALLAH pak gives You Reward buddy the Thing is that , The Thing they Cant Understand Is the Love 😐 ..!!

    Literally Our Shiaatie's Brothers are Unaware of the Love Between The Companions and The prophet Muhammad SAWW (: .! They Were with the prophet SAWW day & Night they use to LEarn from Him , They Respect him care Him , and many Were Given the Good news of Jnnah In thier Lifes too By MuhammaD SAWW (:

    & More & More the Many verses Of RAziiALLAHu Talaah Unhum (: ..! !

    We talk with them i.e our Shia Brothers because We Love them , We care for them , We respect them But on the Other Hand thier Narrations are teaching them to kill Us :/ ..! Awww They are Cursing , they are Teasing , They are mourning and thinking this is ISLAM ???

    With sad Words But Like you Brothet On a Little Scale I am also Doing the Dawah work & In sha ALLAH ..!! !

    Each & Every Our Shia brother will be Muslim 🙂 AWesome Article MA sha ALLAH ❤ ❤ .! !

  14. Syed Najeeb Ali

    thank you for the great post. I was shia before, and just now turned to Islam and became sunni a year ago. The sunni scholars make/show a lot of sense and respect to Ahle bayt and Companions than whom I used to follow, the Shias. Excellent work, this was one question unanswered so far, and I thank you for resolving this one too. I feel the way it is presented in Shia majalis is hilarious….. I am sorry to relate but its more of a drama that too emotional. JazakAllah khair..Syed Najeeb ALi

    • All praise be to Allah. He guides whom He wills.

      • mirza

        Sorah room
        Parah 21
        Ayat no 38
        Sulaiman waris Dawoud
        Sorah Namal..
        Parah 19
        Aayat no 16
        Sorah maryam
        Parah 16
        Ayat 4.5
        Yahya waris zakariya

        This is quran its written in quran that children inherit from father now tell me one thing quran gets implemented to prophets first then ummah its not like that nimaz is for ummah and not for prophets the preacher has more responsibility moreover tell me one thing if fatima s.a went to ask for fadak was she not aware of the fact that it was charitable a women who used to give her food in charity is it possible she would had desired charitable land first of all make one thing clear in your mind who is fatima s.a what is her stature in islam then talk she must had been having pure knowledge that land belonged to her only afterwards she mist had went ahead and how did ali a.s permit her to ask for land which was not hers according to ua discussion ali and fatima were wrong and rest were wright. Which means family of prophet is wrong .wright then do one thing see and try to read life of 3 caliphs ali and fatima u will come to know who is who.

  15. mohd rafiq

    tell off any my Muslim brother do u follow full QURAN or fullHADITH if your answer both how we all believe the quran is fully send by Allah and there was many unreall hadith’s make by many people’s.
    for example bukharies hadith’s which quantity is near about 5000 are choosed from 10 lack hadith’s
    Quran ray o mohmin’s any property which u occupy without war Is the property of MOHAMMAD s.a.w’
    and Abu bakar r.a says the propfrty of mohamad is property of charity
    plz think what was your answer when Allah question’s you at the day of QAYAMAT.

  16. Naeem Abbas

    I am a student of Islamic history my questions are below and hope both ahel e muktab will reply
    Where is in Quran mentioned sunni shia aur ahel hadees are mentioned only we ger the word muslims and ummti of Nabi pak SAW.

    If sayyadia Fatima AS was angry then why Imam e aali muqam Maula Ali was not angry with Hazrat Abu Baker Hazrat Umer and Hazrat Usman RA keeping in view the quote of maula ali that ” some one asked maula ali that why your euling time is not peaceful . Whenever his son Imam Hussain AS did not be tge follower of the yazeed.

    Why shia hazrats are abusing shiaba

  17. Naeem Abbas

    I am a student of Islamic history my questions are below and hope both ahel e muktab will reply
    Where is in Quran mentioned sunni shia aur ahel hadees are mentioned only we ger the word muslims and ummti of Nabi pak SAW.

    If sayyadia Fatima AS was angry then why Imam e aali muqam Maula Ali was not angry with Hazrat Abu Baker Hazrat Umer and Hazrat Usman RA keeping in view the quote of maula ali that ” some one asked maula ali that why your ruling time is not peaceful as compared to Hazrat Abu Baker, Hazrat Umer and Hazrat Usman, Maula Ali replied them I was the advisor of all three and I have no one such advisor. Is this quote confirms that Maula Ali was angry with all three caliphs. Whenever his son Imam Hussain AS did not be the follower of the yazeed bcoz Imam Hussain AS was angry with yazeed.

    I request every one to reply but keeping in view that all caliphs are very much respectable for us being companion of Nabi Pak SAW. They are better than us who attend the company of Nabi Pak SAW.

    Why shia hazrats are abusing shiaba

  18. Ya Zahra

    Thankyou for posting all of the hadith from Bukhari and whichever book you have stated which proves that the daughter of the holy Prophet (saw) and the leader of the women of paradise was sent back empty handed. The rules of inheritence are clearly stated in the quran and the Prophet (saw) cannot deviate from the quran nor make up a law by himself. If the Law for the prophets (saw) wives can be in the quran then the law which you state must be in the quran. You are trying to say that Hazrat Abu Bakr has a higher rank then the Prophets (saw) daughter? U r forgetting that it is from this household that Imam Hassan (as) and Imam Hussain (as) were born due to whom islam was saved. And their mother was Bibi Fatima (sa). She had witnesses Aswell, and they were the two who The Prophet (saw) had said are his sons. So before delving into other books my brother remember the Prophet (saw) cannot say or do anything other than what has been ordered for whole ummah in the holy quran. He cannot make up laws. Other than that, the fact that The daughter of the Prophet (saw) was forced to cone into the darbaar in front of people to ask for her right and the fact that she was sent back empty handed is enough for us. Do you think the leader of the ladies of Paradise was greedy for Fadak. A small piece of land?? Jist stop and think?? She went there to show the true face of people. Moreover these were the same people who had left the Propheta (saw) funeral to attend worldly desires. Where were they then?? Should the prophet (saw) not have been more important than anything else? So the event of fadak happened later, these people did not even have regard for the Prophets (saw) himself. They took 3 days to mourn for the Prophet (saw). It is stated in the quran that every human soul shall be with his imam on the day of judgement. My imam is Imam Ali (as) right to Imam Mahdi (as) who are from the blood line of the Holy Prophet (saw) who is ur Imam? Think about your akhira brother. With a cool mind think about it. Would you like the person who hurt your daughter? And this was the daughter of the Prophet (saw)? How could you possibly recieve the intercession of the Prophet (saw) on the daybof judgement when you are claiming that his daughter was wrong and ahe remained angry with that person until she died? Please i would like the answer to these questions?

    • Don’t make a fool of yourself in public; read the rules of inheritance from Quran Al Kareem then start ranting. Fadak was NOT inherited by virtue of War; it was a treatised land from its owning Jews. Don’t call it an Abayee Property … read the Article and then learn / understand.

  19. Ahmed

    Feed yourselves all the lies you would like. Keep quoting a bunch of historical accounts that are one sided.. Allah will be the judge.
    Where are the accounts of Fatima(as)?
    Who will pay for the killing of over 100 000 sahaba?
    Why were the sahaba fighting Amir Ali(as) in Jamal, Siffin and Nahrawan? Only in sunni islam are the murderers are going to heaven.. big joke!
    This is from an ex sunni whos been guided to shia islam.

    • I see nothing but exaggeration and baseless information in your comment.

      100,000 Sahaba? You are wrong. 90% of Sahaba did not take part in the civil war (Siffin, Jamal etc) because they considered them to be Fitna. There were more Sahaba on the side of Ali than Muawiyah. Nahrawan were Khawarij not Sahaba. Sunnis don’t believe murderers will go to heaven. Fighting in a battle and killing is not murder. Learn this.

      No, you are not guided but misguided and your lack of knowledge proves it.

    • Read now: An’Nisa 04:115. “And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad SAW) after the right path has been shown clearly to him, and follows other than the believers’ way. We shall keep him in the path he has chosen, and burn him in Hell – what an evil destination”

  20. Follwer of MUHAMMAD P.B.U.H

    Follower of Muhammad
    Its not for us to decide who was Right or Wrong Allah knows better.
    Those are All pious people in the above discussion and we should respect them All.
    Even the Jews and Christians don’t curse to each other’s religion like you people are doing.you just cant figure out exactly the facts about an incident which happened just 13 years ago like 9/11, then how could u figure it out something which was happened 1425 years ago and based on that start cursing prestigious personalities.Its better we all should ask Allah in every prayer to guide all of us to straight path which will lead us to Jannah.
    Unity among Muslims is the need of the hour.
    It is a fact that Muslims today, are divided amongst themselves. The tragedy is that such divisions are not endorsed by Islam at all. Islam believes in fostering unity amongst its followers.

    The Glorious Qur’an says:

    “And hold fast, all together, by the rope which Allah (stretches out for you), and be not divided among yourselves;”
    [Al Qur’an 3:103]

    Which is the rope of Allah that is being referred to in this verse? It is the Glorious Qur’an. The Glorious Qur’an is the rope of Allah which all Muslims should hold fast together. There is double emphasis in this verse. Besides saying ‘hold fast all together’ it also says, ‘be not divided’. That clearly shows; division is not allowed among Muslims.

    The Qur’an further says:

    “Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger”
    [Al Qur’an 4:59]

    All the Muslims should follow the Qur’an and authentic ahadith and be not divided among themselves.

    2. It is prohibited to make sects and divisions in Islam
    The Glorious Qur’an says:

    “As for those who divide their religion and break up into sects, thou hast no part in them in the least: Their affair is with Allah: He will in the end tell them the truth of all that they did.”

    [Al Qur’an 6:159]

    In this verse Allah (subhanuhu wataala) says that one should disassociate oneself from those who divide their religion and break it up into sects.

  21. Waqar Salman

    It clearly states that Fadak was inherited to Muslim Ummah not for Household of the Prophet (saw). Further, the Ahl-bayt or even any of true muslim never need the wealth of the World. They have always do charity for us (the Muslim Ummah). This piece of land is important for us not for thoae who are the owner of Heavens (Ahl-bayt)

  22. It would be really sad if a non-Muslim read the comments on this site; it is true that Islamic history must be studied. That does not give us a license, however, to dictate who is defined as a “Muslim”, and who isn’t. If someone was to curse Islam on this site, wouldn’t we all be united and defined our beloved religion, regardless of our sect? At such a crucial time, its important that we all open our eyes and see the war-mongering and divergence that Zionists have created in our world, especially what is occurring with the Saudi-led intervention ( more like an invasion, especially since Saudi-Arabia hypocritically cares about Yemen, after refusing it membership in the GCC ) in Yemen.


    A fellow Muslim 🙂

  23. ali

    this article is as fake as the entire wahabi/salafi sect.!!!! To us Shias Quran is very Important >The BOOk says PROPHET SAW leaves iinhertitance and fadak was not won in a war booty.!!but u still decide to choose hadis over quran.!! ?Have u forgoton Mubhaila and HADIS kisa why were only these 4 taken along with Prohphet saw and Hadis kisa tells that ALLAH made them pure of all impurties and etc,!!!SO there was no question BIBI S.a was lying .As Proven by 100s of sunni books umer ra denied PROPHET SAW the right of pen and paper on his death bed. 100s of ahadis to PROVE PROPHET SAW said after me is Quran and ahlebait. .islam the thruth u have lost this argument and u will carry on losing untill ur saudi fathers print more nonsense and spread to people.!

    • Not a single core beliefs of your sect are in the Quran. So you use your fabricated Hadiths to prove your beliefs. If you and your sect gave Quran such importance, then Shiism would have collapsed.

  24. sikander

    Woe to you! O writer of this article. Man tell me who authorized you to represent Sunnis? Crap like you only bring bad name to Islam. Your thoughts are intended to bring division and not unity among the Believers. By the by, I’m a Muslim unlike people here that claim to be Sunnis and Shi’a.




    very sick detail conversation ………..so simple answer is available. Holy Quran was available. No one have any right to hold the property of any one. Let all this be decided by the real owner of property but they were refused. Real owner of properly were generous and no one left empty from their home. They can do more then the people who hold their properly at that time.

  27. Ahmed

    What I dont understand is that to my knowledge a Hadith is something the beloved Nabi (SAW) said, documented by scholars. Here the author of this page quotes Hadith for and against, however, the history being debated here occured after the demise of the beloved Nabi (SAW), so logically, how can this be Hadith? Is it not just history (information) recorded by the historians of the time? Can someone kindly explain this?

  28. Yusufi

    Salam Alaikum

    The writer has said many falsehoods, but I will examine a few points he made to show how either deceptive or ignorant he is. I am referrering to the points he wrote as cited below:

    The chain of narration for this is: Ibn Sa’d < Shababah ibn Sawar < Abdul-A'al ibn Abil-Musawir < Hammad >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    b. When Hz. Fatima[ra] died Hz. Abu Bakr[ra] and Hz. Umar[ra] came, Hz. Abu Bakr[ra] asked Hz. Ali[ra] to lead prayer, Hz.Ali[ra] declined and said in presence of Khalifa of RasoolAllah[saw] how can I. [ Ali Mutaqi Al Nahdi author of Kanzal Amaal Vol 6 page 318, narrated through Khatib from Baqir]
    c. ماتت فاطمة بين المغرب والعشاء فحضرها أبو بكر وعمر وعثمان والزبير وعبد الرحمن بن عوف رضي الله عنهم، فلما وضعت ليصلي عليها، قال على: تقدم يا أبا بكر، قال أبو بكر رضي الله عنه: وأنت يا أبا الحسن؟ قال: نعم، فوالله لا يصلي عليها غيرك، فصلى عليها أبو بكر رضي الله عنه ودفنت ليلاً

    Ali bin al Husein narrated: Hz. Fatima[ra] died betwen Maghrib and Isha so Hz. Abu Bakr[ra] and Hz. Umar[ra] And Uthman and Zubair and AbdulRahman bin Awf (raa) came, Hz. Ali said: Come forth ya Abu Bakr, then Abu Bakr[ra] asked Hz. Ali[ra]: What about you ya Abu al Hassan? Hz.Ali[ra] declined saying: yes by Allah no one but you prays on her, So Abu Bakr did and she was buried at night.
    source: Mukhtasar Kitab al muwafaqah, has weakness in the Isnad and what is Sahih is that Ali prayed on her in Sahih Muslim #1759.
    d. عن الشعبي أنه قال: (لما مرضت فاطمة أتاها أبو بكر الصديق فاستأذن عليها، فقال علي: يافاطمة هذا أبو بكر يستأذن عليك؟ فقالت: أتحب أن آذن له؟ قال: نعم، فأذنت له فدخل عليها يترضاها، فقال: والله ما تركت الدار والمال، والأهل والعشيرة، إلا إبتغاء مرضاة الله، ومرضاة رسوله، ومرضاتكم أهل البيت، ثم ترضاها حتى رضيت)- السنن الكبرى للبيهقي 6/301-

    “When Fatima became ill, Abu Bakr came to her and asked for permission to enter. So Ali said, ‘O Fatima, this is Abu Bakr asking for permission to enter.’ She answerd, ‘Do you want me to give him permission?’ He said, ‘Yes.’ So she allowed him (to enter), and he came in seeking her pleasure, so he told her: ‘By Allah, I only left my home and property and my family seeking the pleasure of Allah and His Messenger and you, O Ahlel Bayt.’ So he talked to her until she was pleased with him.” (Sunan Al-Bayhaqi, vol 6, page 301)

    This Hadith is narrated by Bayhaqi in al Sunan al Kubra (6:300-301) and Dala’il al-Nubuwwa (7:273-281) who said: “It is narrated with a good (hasan) chain.” Muhibb al Din al-Tabari cited it in al Riyad Al Nadira (2:96-97 #534) and Dhahabi in the Siyar (Ibid).

    لما مرضت فاطمة أتاها أبو بكر الصديق فاستأذن عليها فقال علي يا فاطمة هذا أبو بكر يستأذن عليك فقالت أتحب أن آذن له قال نعم فأذنت له فدخل عليها يترضاها فقال والله ما تركت الدار والمال والأهل والعشيرة إلا ابتغاء مرضاة الله ومرضاة رسوله ومرضاتكم أهل البيت ثم ترضاها حتى رضيت

    Al-Bayhaqi, Ibn Kathir, and Ibn Hajar all authenticate this hadith & Ibn Kathir states it as Sahih in his Al Bidayah and Ibn Hajar in his Fath Al Bari.
    وقال ابن حجر: «وهو وإن كان مرسلاً فاسناده إلى الشعبي صحيح»- فتح الباري 6/202
    Ibn hajar says : the mursal of Shuba [الشعبي] is sahih
    This is gross mistranslation. Ibn Hajr said: "Although it is Mursal, its chain to al-Sha'bi is saheeh."
    Assuming that al-Sha'bi's mursal narrations are strong, it cannot compare to and contend with any authentic narration which clearly tell us that Fatimah [a] died angry at Abu Bakr and Abu Bakr was not present at her funeral.

    This is a glimpse of the deception in this writer's article, its up to the readers who wish to seek the truth to make the effort and find it.

  29. umber faraz

    I am not shia but I want to ask you one thing. your friends are more dear to you than your daughter your son in law and your grandsons ? Prophet SalAllaho loved his family the most that’s why he SalAllaho only took his family for mobhala. y didn’t he SalAllaho took other sahaba karam ra if they were more dear to him (salAllaho ) . shia may b wrong in many things but love for ahle bait must be there and we should not compare other sahaba ra with ahle bait bcz they are servants of ahle bait for your v kind information.
    bhughz ahle bait samjh say bahir ha. Allah or usky Rasool Pak SalAllaho say hi thori haya kro ap log.

    • Why do you Shias keep lying and pretend to be Sunni?

      You just said it in your other comment that you are Shia.

      • fabeeha faraz

        When did I say I am shia I am not shia and not sunni I am just muslim . if you dare prove the superiority of Abu baker answer my questions. Don’t be stubborn on your wrong faith. Fear Allah prove superiority that’s it you can’t prove that’s why blaming me for being shia. Prove if you can my open challenge to you. Just prove leave shia sun I fight, prove if you can

  30. umber faraz

    why you prefer Abu baker radi Allah over Quran and Khatoon e jannet? did holy prophet SalAllaho ever preferred his companions over his blessed family? who was taken to mobhala? who was given alam on the occasion of Khyber ? whose hand was raised during khutba huja tul wida? why prophet Salallaho wasalam did not marry Fatima Alihisalam to Hazret Abu baker siddique ra? Hazret Abu baker ra tried hard to marry Fatima Alihisalam but he was refused softly by Prophet salSllaho wasalam. if Abu baker has higher ranks than ahlebait then why prophet SalAllaho ignored him on all these important matters why He salAllaho said in his last khutba that I am leaving my ahle bait for you and raised the blessed hand of Ali Alihisalam? why prophet salAllaho did not bring Abu baker ra there? do you have any answer to this hadees jiska ma mola hon uska Ali b mola ha..why not Abu baker ra? don’t close your eyes love for ahle bait is part of our eman knowledge of Fatima Alihisalam of Quran and Islam is higher than Abu baker Ra. she is daughter of Prophet SalAllaho who opened her eyes as a Muslim in the lap of Prophet SalAllaho , how come you prefer others over her? Allah ki panah ahle bait say bhugz . suuni thee mai b but not now I am Muslim and servant of Allah and punjtan pak. no more sunni who praise every single enemy of ahle bait. prophet SalAllaho ki sunnet ahle bait say pyar ha unky dushmono say nhi. sahi ko sahi or ghalt ko ghalt kehna seekho werna pachtao gy .

    • A common non sectarian Muslim

      My Shia and Sunni brothers, why are you fighting? Please stop this. Please stop this. This is not taking us anywhere? Seriously. The only problem in the phenomenal growth of Muslims today is the dissension in their rank and file. Tough times are ahead. Are we not killing each other today like we used to do before? You know what? There never has been any truth and reconciliation effort between various sects in the history of Islam. Shia are custodian are immensity of precious knowledge and so are Sunnis. The Ummah should sit together at top level (only humane and learned scholars from both sides) and come up with a code of conduct for an ideal Muslim Ummah and develop a common narrative of the things that are affecting them and are going to affect them. But alas, conflicts are re-centered among us and fanned by the interest groups on both sides. Just a Persian couplet to finish my argument. Islam ma attaa’at e khulfa e rashideen. Eemaan ma muhabbat e Ahle e Bayat.

  31. David Kuperman

    If AbuBaker called Fatima a liar then AbuBaker is the biggest liar because ALLAH declared Fatima a Truthful. ————————————————————————–

    Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 325:
    Narrated ‘Aisha: (mother of the believers) After the death of Allah ‘s Apostle Fatima the daughter of Allah’s Apostle asked Abu Bakr As-Siddiq to give her, her share of inheritance from what Allah’s Apostle had left of the Fai (i.e. booty gained without fighting) which Allah had given him. Abu Bakr said to her, “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Our property will not be inherited, whatever we (i.e. prophets) leave is Sadaqa (to be used for charity).” Fatima, the daughter of Allah’s Apostle got angry and stopped speaking to Abu Bakr, and continued assuming that attitude till she died. Fatima remained alive for six months after the death of Allah’s Apostle.

    QURAN 3:61] If any one disputes in this matter with thee, now after (full) knowledge Hath come to thee, say: “Come! let us gather together,- our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves: Then let us earnestly pray, and invoke the curse of Allah on those who lie!”
    This verse refers to the well-known event of mubahilah mentioned in every book of history, traditions and tafsir written by Muslim scholars. The Holy Prophet was sending invitations to all to accept the true religion of Allah. Tribe after tribe, region after region, were coming into the fold of Islam. One such invitation was sent to the Christians of Najran, a town in Yemen, in the 9th year of Hijra. A deputation of 60 scholars came to discuss the matter with the Holy Prophet. Abdul Masih, the chief monk, asked him as to who was the father of Isa, thinking that the Holy Prophet would accept (God as the father of Isa. Verse 59 of this surah was revealed and presented to the Christians as a reply but they did not listen to reason. Then this verse was revealed to call them to a spiritual contest by invoking the curse of Allah on the liars mubahilah.

    The Christians agreed to this contest. Early next morning, the 24th of the month of Dhilhijjah, the Holy Prophet sent Salman to the selected site, outside the city area, to set up a shelter for those whom he would take with him, as his sons, women and selves. A large number of companions assembled in the masjid, making themselves available for the selection.

    On the opposite side of the field, selected for the contest, the Christians, with their selected men, women and children appeared on the scene.

    At the appointed hour, a huge crowd, standing in wait, saw the Holy Prophet coming in, Imam Husayn in his arms, Imam Hasan holding his index finger, walking beside him, Bibi Fatimah Zahra, close to his heels and Imam Ali just behind her-as his sons, women, and selves. It should be noted that although there was provision for “women” and “selves” the Holy Prophet selected one “woman” and one “self”-Fatimah and Ali, because there was no woman and no man among his followers at that time who could be brought into the contest of invoking the curse of Allah on the liars. They alone were the truthful ones. (see commentary of al Tawbah: 119).

    The Holy Prophet raised his hands to the heaven and said:

    “O my Lord! These are my Ahle Baite”.

    The Prophet (s) said, “Fatima is part of me. Whatever upsets her upsets me, and whatever harms her harms me.” Sahih Muslim, v. 5, p. 54; Khasa’is Al-Imam Ali of Nisa’i, p. 121-122; Masabih Al-Sunnah, v. 4, p. 185; Al-Isabah, v. 4, p. 378; Seir Alam Al-Nubala’, v. 2, p. 119; Kenz Al-Omal, v. 13, p. 97; similar wording is related in Al-Tirmidhi, v. 3, Chapter on the Virtues of Fatima, p. 241; Haliyat Al-Awliya’, v.2, p. 40; Muntakhab Kenz Al-Omal, in the margins of Al-Musnad, v. 5, p. 96; Maarifat Ma Yajib Li Aal Al-Bait Al-Nabawi Min Al-Haqq Alaa Men Adahum, p. 58; Dhakha’ir Al-Uqubi, p. 38; Tadhkirat Al-Khawass, p. 279; Yanabi^ Al-Mawadda, v.2, ch. 59, p. 478.

    The Prophet (s) said, “Fatima is the head of the women of Paradise.” Sahih Al-Bukhari, v. 3, Kitab Al-Fadha’il, Chapter on the Virtues of Fatima, p. 1374; Mustadrak Al-Sahihain, v. 3, Chapter on the Virtues of Fatima, p. 164; Sunan Al-Tirmidhi, v. 3, p. 266; Kenz Al-Omal, v. 13, p. 193; Muntakhab Kenz Al-Omal, v. 5, p. 97; Al-Jami^ Al-Sagheer, v. 2, no. 564, p. 5760; Seir Alam Al-Nubala’, v. 2, p. 123; Al-Sawaiq Al-Muhariqa, p. 187 & 191; Khasai’s Al-Imam Ali of Nisa’i, p. 118; Yanabi^ Al-Mawadda, v. 2, p. 79; Al-Jawhera Fi Nasab Ali Wa Aalihi, p. 17; Al-Bidaya wa Al-Nihaya, v. 2, p. 60.

    The Prophet (s) said, “Fatima is part of me, so whoever makes her angry makes me angry.” Sahih Al-Bukhari, v. 3, Kitab Al-Fadha’il, Chapter on the Virtues of Fatima, p. 1374; Khasa’is Al-Imam Ali of Al-Nisa’i, p. 122; Al-Jami^ Al-Sagheer, v. 2, p. 653, n. 5858; Kenz Al-Omal, v. 3, pp. 93-97; Muntakhab in the margin of Al-Musnad, v. 5, p. 96; Masabih Al-Sunnah, v. 4, p. 185; Is^af Al-Raghibeen, p. 188; Dakha’ir Al-Uqubi, p. 37; Yanabi^ Al-Mawadda, v. 2, pp. 52-79.

    • Abubakr didn’t call Fatima a liar nor Fatima called Abubakr a liar. The liars are the Imami takfiri Shias who falsely claim to have love for Fatima but in reality She and the Ahlulbayt are free from their lies and fabrications.

  32. Shia sunni wahabi salafi =Islam .We all think we right okay follow your deen but don’t cross hatred line we all need to respect each other then putting each one down its effected us effecting us and will effect more don’t make fun of this beautiful deen Islam…

  33. Whenever shias try to prove something they prove it from sunni books why is it that when sunnis try to justify something they never quite shia book?
    I request you to prove your point with the help of references from shia faith books

    • slm..alkm..firstly lets get this clear that there is no shia ..sunni…arguments here. Lets understand history and our religion well and after getting facts correct lets put logic and our brains to work which our sharia wants us to do. allah clealry wants every muslim to be learnt and know what is right and wrong and Islam is all about science and scientist are still finding things which is already mentioned in Quran Sheriff..

      Coming back to history. One thing is clear and there is no arguments on this topic between any groups i.e. B.B Fatima as is masoom ( Cannot lie…pure…clean) also she is General of Ladies ( Sardar of women) in Heaven.. No arguments here between sunni..shia..etc…

      Now my simple question is if the above is correct than if she goes to Abu bakr and demands her Share which she claimed her father made in his will keeping witness Please explain who is abu bakr to explain to her that she is mistaken or that the land fadak does no belong to her as per sharia law.

      Why is there even little confusion on the above topic. Lets not go in the argument that BB fatima as argued with abu bakr. she was angry with him etc etc. My simple question is can a masoom who is leader of women in heaven, pure, go and ask for her rights be wrong in the first place?!!!

      If she asked for her share than she is right without any argument. Lets remember along with being masoom and leader of women in heaven she is also a guide to all muslims, she like her father teaches us all how to lead our life’s. Such a holy person will not go and ask something which does not belong to her and finally a Teacher will always teach students students will not teach a teacher.

      By saying abu bakr corrected BB Fatima as we are placing him above her…..really sorry to say this but even a 8 year old child will correct all those people who side abu bakr.

    • Bother you have said why whenever sunni has doubts shia correct sunni’s by using sunni books and not shia books, and you further say why shia does not use shia book to show sunni what is correct.

      Your question has the answer in itself. Shia follow’s Quran Sheriff and Rasool allah s.a.w. and ahle byait ( Rasool allah s.a.w. BB Fatima as, Imam Ali as, Imam Hassan as, Imam Hussain as) we do not have any other books to follow, follow Quran Sheriff all answer’s are there , if you do not understand the meaning in Quran learn the answer from ahle byait.

      Now coming back to your question why does shia correct sunni using Sunni books, its simple brother ,books can be wrong, Quran cannot be wrong, your books are all written by those people of times when they were either controlled by the wrong people or were influenced by the wrong people.

      Sunni books accepts that in ahle byait there are only 5 names above mentioned still other sunni books contradict the same why no body knows?!

      Sunni books accepts that BB fatima is masoom.. still when she went o abu bakr to ask for her share her rightfull property she was denied the same…

      Sunni books acknowledges that event of Mubaila still they interpret the same differently…

      sunni books accepts the events of Gadeer still they change the meaning of the sayings of the prophet…

      We muslims all know that Islam is a perfect religion..still we say The holy prophet did not mention his successor?!! brother’s is this really possible a religion left without naming a proper guide..

      Lets not deny all these and say shia is wrong sunni is correct.

      The holy prophet said who is with me and my daughter is with me. who hurts her hurts me who angers her angers me, who is not with her is not with me and Islam.

      Now when a group of people followed the Holy Prophets order’s they became shia’s and bad people?!!!

  34. Ahle sunnat

    mashaALLAH.. very detailed and well researched.. may ALLAH reward you for your efforts with the best of both worlds..

  35. fabeeha faraz

    who is abu bakar? do not forget abu baker is a slave of ahle bayt. do not worship him and treat him like a god. On which authority he called daughter of Prophet muhammed salAllaho in his court? who was he to decide about what prophet has left for his daughter ? shame on you snatching the right of syedda sa and then feeling proud of it. which face you will show to Holy prophet on the day of judgement? you can’ t be muslims who stand against the daughter of Holy prophet salAllaho and give prferrence to other people.

    • You are lying upon Sayyida Fatima (ra). Abubakr (ra) respected her and she respected him.

      • Slm…

        Brother lets not argue who is lying who is not. All hadiths are clearly saying that B.B. fatima as was upset with Abu bakr! this is true with Shia , Sunni, Jews, christains hadiths.. so Question is after RasoolAllah SAW death why was she unhappy with abu bakr.? All sects Hadiths clearly states that she asked abu bakr who was holding fadak to give it to her ! she never got fadak.

        Brother you are saying BB fatima as was never secretly buried, I have come to conclusion after reading your statement that you do not know History well of our religion. so I will ask you to check if any person till date know’s exactly where is teh Grave of BB Fatima as, answer is nobody know’s and nobody is sure where it is.

        If she was not secretly buried than we all would know where she is buried !

        On a closing note I would like to say that our Religion clearly says understand your religion very well and also other religion very well , ask as many questions as you want to clear doubts and most important educate yourself well.

        If we educate ourselves well and check history well than in today’s times I don’t think tjhere will be any dispute between shia and sunni because the hostory is well written and events makes it all things clear.

        I will end my topic with last note for you to Think
        Our religion is perfect religion so is it possible that Allah S.b.a.t. did not tell his messenger to declare the guide of out religion after Rasool allah S.a.w.,

        My brother it next to impossible that our messenger did not declare the guide of Islam after his death. Now there were forces who did not want Ali as. to be the guide so politics took place and rest is history.

        finally coming back to fadak, do you know who Abu bakr gave fadak ! please check history , it was given to 3 people from his family.

      • ZAINAB

        Read your books properly as you are clearly lying to your self or have been lied to very well. So sad

  36. NicheofThelights

    Thank you!

  37. John Raza

    So you are saying that Syed Fatima claim was false (Nauzubiilah) or She was not aware about islam and quotes of Her own Father (Prophet Muhammad) PBUH ?

    How about for asking some thing when you don’t of right on that ? When some one daughter come on the door we never turn her back she was Syeda Daughter of Prophet she ask for the thing which she have right on.

    She don’t have property from inheritance of Prohpeht while on other hand Hazrat Ayesha got property from home of Prohphet that why she gave place to burry Hazrat Abu Baker R.A in her house. Not sure how was that Muslims who turned daughter of Prophet empty handed.

  38. David Kuperman

    The dirt under the feet of Bibi Fizza the servant of Bibi Fatima is better than AbuBakr, Umar and Uthman.

  39. After reading the comments I’m shocked as to how quick the Google muftis come out fighting… firstly, none of you were there and neither was I.. so Allah knows best…

    Secondly, I don’t think Allah’s concern is going to be whether you knew the truth or not… your purpose is to worship him and follow the sunna of the prophet pbuh), and not to be concerned about their affairs in the household! You’re not going to get rewarded for that… your reward is in your worship… and you are only going to be asked 3 questions… and it will not be on this topic!! So as a Muslim to another muslim I suggest you get your priorities straight!! Salaam


    The Shia Of Kufah Deceived, Deserted, Ambushed And Murdered The Grandson Of The Prophet Al-Husayn, His Brothers And His Children And Took Their Women As Captives

    The above article we will Insha’Allaah, sketch out some historical details which are based overwhelmingly upon Shia sources and outline the build up to the oppressive and unjust murder of al-Husayn, and then look at these Shia sources to see who actually murdered al-Husayn.

    These books include : al-Shia wal-Aashooraa of Ridhaa Husayn Subh al-Husnee, Seerah al-A’immah al-Ithnaa Ashar by Haashim Ma’roof al-Husnee, al-Majaalis al-Faahkirah of Abd al-Husayn Sharaf al-Deen al-Mawsawi, Maqtal Husayn of Abd al-Razzaaq al-Mawsawi al-Muqrim, Muntahaa al-Aamaal of Abbaas al-Qummee, Alaa Khattay al-Husayn of Ahmad Raasim al-Nafees, al-Ihtijaaj of al-Tabarsee and numerous others.

    courtesy : http://www.shia.bs

    Numerous Shia authorities, from their Shaykhs, quote from Ali bin al-Husayn bin Ali bin Abi Taalib (known as Zayn al-Aabideen) that he addressed the Shia who deserted his father and killed him, reviling them, saying:
    O people, we implore you by Allaah, do you know that you wrote to my father and you deceived him and you gave him the pledge, the covenant, and you killed him and deserted him? So may you perish for what you have sent forth for yourselves, and for your evil opinionn. With which eye will you look towards the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam) when he says to you, “You killed my family, and you violated my sanctity, so you are not from me.” [Al-Tabarsee in al-Ihtijaaj (2/32), Ibn Taawoos in al-Malhoof (p. 92), al-Ameen in al-Lawaa’ij al-Ashjaann (p. 158), Abbaas al-Qummee in Muntahaa al-Aamaal (1/572), Husayn Kawrani in Fee Rihaab al-Karbalaa (p. 183), Abd al-Razzaaq al-Muqrim in Maqtal Husayn ((p. 317), Murtadaa Iyaad in Maqtal Husayn (p. 87) and Ridhaa al-Qawzeenee in Tadhlim al-Zahraa (p. 262), Abbaas al-Qummee in Nafs al-Mahmoom (p. 360)]
    And when Ali bin al-Husayn Zayn al-Aabideen (rahimahullaah) saw the people of Kufah wailing and crying, he rebuked them, saying:
    You wail and cry for us, so who are the ones who killed us? [Maqtal Husayn of Murtadaa Iyaad (p. 83), Tadhlim al-Zahraa of al-Qazweenee (p. 257) and al-Malhoof of Ibn Taawoos (p. 86), Nafs al-Mahmoom of Abbaas al-Qummee (p. 357)]
    And in another narration that he was passing by them and he was ill and he said in a weak voice:
    Are you wailing and crying for us? Who are the ones who killed us? [Abbaas al-Qummee in Muntahaa al-Aamaal (1/570)]
    And in another narration that he said:
    These people cry over us but who killed us other than them? [Al-Ihtijaaj of al-Tabarsee (2/29)]
    And Shia sources quoted Umm Kulthum bint Ali (radiallaahu anhumaa) as saying:
    O people of Kufah, disgrace upon you. What is with you that you deserted Husayn and killed him and you plundered his wealth and inherited it, and you took his women as captives, and you caused him distress. May you perish and may you be annihilated … what burden have you carried upon your backs and which blood have you shed … you killed the best of men after the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa aalihi) and mercy has been snatched from your hearts. [Nafs al-Mahmoom (p. 262), Maqtal Husayn of al-Muqrim (p. 316), Lawaa’ij al-Ashjaan (p. 157) and others.]
    And the Shia, Asad Haydar quotes from Zaynab bint Ali bin Abi Taalib (radiallaahu anhumaa), which is also mentioned by al-Tabarsee in al-Ihtijaaj (2/29-30):
    Killed along with Husayn were other sons of Ali bin Abi Talib, from them (according to numerous Shia authorities themselves) Abu Bakr bin Ali, Umar bin Ali, Uthman bin Ali, and also Ali’s grandsons through al-Hasan, Abu Bakr bin al-Hasan bin Ali and Umar bin al-Hasan bin Ali.
    Note: Have you just noticed the names of those killed from Ahl al-Bayt who were with al-Husayn?! Then you will understand why the lying Shia never mention their names when they tell their story of Karbala from the pulpit to an ignorant Shia audience! This is because the common Shia will realize that the Ahl al-Bayt loved the three caliphs so much they named their own children with their names!

    The Raafidah (Shee’ah) Are The Worst Of Liars

    Imaam Maalik was asked about the Raafidah, so he said, “Do not speak to them, nor relate from them, for indeed they lie.” [Minhaaj As-Sunnah, 1/13]
    Shareek Ibn ‘Abdillaah Al-Qaadee, known to have leanings towards exaggerating regarding the Prophet (saw)’s family, though he was just said, “Take from all whom you meet, except for the Raafidah, for they fabricate hadeeths and then take it to be their Religion.“ [Minhaaj As-Sunnah]
    Hammaad Ibn Salamah said, “One of the shaykhs of the Raafidah said, ‘When we used to gather and find something to be good, we would make it a hadeeth.’ ” [Minhaaj As-Sunnah]
    Imaam Ash-Shaafi’ee said, “Among the people who follow their own desires, I have not seen a group bear witness to more lies than the Raafidah.” [Ikhtisaar Uloom Al-Hadeeth, by Ibn Katheer, p.109]
    Not only were the Shee’ah the worst of liars, they were also the first to fabricate ahaadeeth:
    Ibn Abee Al-Hadeed said, “Know that lies in the hadeeth of virtues first started with the Shee’ah…” [Sharh Nahjul Balaaghah, 2/134]
    ^This is with the knowledge that Ibn Abee Al-Hadeed was himself a Shee’ah and a Mu’tazilee.

  41. Adamu shuaibu

    May his gentle soul rest in perfect peace (i.e, Abu bakr ra)

  42. tanveer Ali

    one thing is clear, that Fatemah sa demanded her right. and Abu bakar refused her presenting islamic and sharia rules( her demand is illigal).
    even Her husband Ali as and her two children Hassan ans Hussain witnessed in her favour.
    even after Abu bakar refused to do so
    very Good.
    Did Ali ,Hassan and Hussain committed a false witness?
    Had Abu bakar better knowledge of Islam then Ali and his sons?
    Was Fatemah demanding her share and her right to which she was not leagally owner?
    Did Fatemah sa get angry to Abu bakar?
    and now the narration of Saheeh bukhari is presented in favour of Abu bakar to justify his doings correct ….
    Saheeh bukhari… who is aurther and compiler of Saheeh bukhari? when he compiled it. how late he wrote those Hadees, the authentcity of these hadees?.
    the person who narrated these hadees, espacially when such Hadees differ Daughter of Mohammed saw, Ali as, Hassan and Hussain..
    what a common sense…..🙄

  43. Fiza

    When you try to weigh the leader of the Women of Paradise against a man who called her a liar your arguements fall short. What you have done is prove our very point in the whole of your discussion. Every rule meant solely for Rasoolallah saw such as the night prayer tahajjud being wajib upon him his wives not being allowed to marry after his death are mentioned in the Quran so why not a special ruling for his children and his inheritance. Further to this point you have proven that your books.have contradictions one saying she died angry and in another that she was pleased with him so you cannot call them sahih. Within the quran if you look at the asbab ul nazool of surahs and ayats relating to the holy household such as the event of mubahila, surah dahr, ayat tatheer, surah kausar and many more, they signify and streß the purity and truthfulness of the progeny of Muhammad saw. You see we bring our proof from the quran first and foremost whilst you cannot decide which one of your books you want to follow. We weigh each hadith against the Quran and if they dont match we reject. Why do you revere others more than the holy bloodline of the holy Prophet saw? I want to understand what the problem is? The holy bloodline of the Prophet saw was murdered for years but which one of your revered leaders stood for them and fought to protect them? Ali as was the first one to follow the Prophet saw, fought in every battle to protect Islam and the Holy Prophet saw, slept in his bed to protect him and didnt care if he was slain whilst protecting him. Married to his daughter Leader of the women of Paradise, father of the youth of Paradise, shares the same bloodline of Rasoolallah saw, born in the Kaaba and only one who gave sadaqah whilst in sujood for which ayat were revealed. His children were the teachers of the ones whose books you follow today. Our only crime is that we follow the teachers of your teachers. We follow the ones from the bloodline of Rasoolallah saw the purified ones, and as it says in 6 of your sahih books, the quran and ahlubayt as are the ones we follow. You can argue until the day you die about who is in the Ahlulbayt as but the first right to this title goes only to his bloodline and cannot be disputed. Saqifah was a joke, and inshallah you will realise that one day. The fact that you take Abu bakr as beinh nore knowledgeable than the Leader of the Woman of paradise bewilderes me. Because of this, i find it hard to believe that you will take into consideration any proofs i produce as your mindset it not to understand and learn but to argue and prove a point. You think the woman who has jannah wanted a piece of land. She has JANNAH. she is the LEADER. The rulings of the quran were being distorted this is why she caused a reveolution which sadly resulted in her being seriously injured and miscarrying. Thats for another discussion. If all the property belonged to the people and was charity then why was tbe house of Rasoolallah saw not taken from Ayesha and given as sadaqah. Yet he was given permission to be buried their. And so now you will say that no only the children cannot inherit the wives can. Ok. So rasoolallah saw hs nine wives. And 1/8 is to go to the wives. That means ayesha gets 1/72 of the House of Rasoolallah saw which means only Abu Bakrs head should be burried there. You pick and choose and have strayed from the Quran and Ahlulbayt as. Your 3 khakifas state themselves that they would have perished if Ali as hadent have helped them. Yes he helped them and did not fight for khilafa because his announcemtent had already been made at Ghadir Khumm and the ones who followed Rasoolallah saw took Ali as as the wali After Rasoolallah saw. And finally we do not appreciate the fact that the corpse of Rasoolallah saw was left alone whilst people were at the hoke of Saqifah. But May Allah guide you. Ali as is to Rasoolallah saw as Haroon was to Moses but not a Prophet saw. Gain knowledge to underatand the truth and not to prove a point. All you have done in your discussion is proved defects within yohr vooks and strengthened our case even more. You cannot cover up haq with lies and half truths. Haq is with Ali as and Ali as is with Haq. Fatima is a part of me. If it wasebt for Ali as Allah would not have created Rasoolallah saw, and if it wasent for Fatima, neither would have been created. (Sunni books) peace to you May Allah guide you to be with those who are on the Sirat e Mustaqeem. Ma Assalam

  44. The Hadith that Rasulallah (ص) said that: ‘We prophets don’t inherit’ is false if you examine the Matn. How? Well je used the plural ‘we’ if he had used the singular this Hadith would be subject to more of a in depth debate, but seeing that he said that we prophets don’t inherit because in fact according to the Holy Qur’an they do:….[REST OF COMMENT REMOVED]

    [AdMIN Message: Your long copy-paste post from a Shia website was cropped]

  45. Muhamad

    I’m a follower of the Shafii school of thought. The fact is Umar abdul Aziz returned Fadak to ahlul Bayt openly stating Fadak belongs to Ahlul bayt. He also stopped the cursing of sayidina Ali from the mimbar.Hiding facts from us Muslim will never end this confusion . Mistakes were done .They are not maasum . Its okay . The more we hide and twist the facts the more Infallible you make Abu Bakar/ Umar appear .

    • It seems you have been reading Shia propaganda materials a lot. Where is the evidence that Umar bin Abdul Aziz said Fadak belongs to Fatima? On contrary he clearly said that Fadak did not belong to Fatima. According to reports he returned FADAK to its ORIGINAL state (like it was during Prophet’s (saw), Abubakr, Umar etc after him) because some of Bani Ummayah took fadak for themselves.

      In Sunan abu Dawud we read:

      حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ الْجَرَّاحِ، حَدَّثَنَا جَرِيرٌ، عَنْ الْمُغِيرَةِ، قَالَ: جَمَعَ عُمَرُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ بَنِي مَرْوَانَ حِينَ اسْتُخْلِفَ، فَقَالَ: إِنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ كَانَتْ لَهُ فَدَكُ فَكَانَ يُنْفِقُ مِنْهَا وَيَعُودُ مِنْهَا عَلَى صَغِيرِ بَنِي هَاشِمٍ وَيُزَوِّجُ مِنْهَا أَيِّمَهُمْ، وَإِنَّ فَاطِمَةَ سَأَلَتْهُ أَنْ يَجْعَلَهَا لَهَا فَأَبَى فَكَانَتْ كَذَلِكَ فِي حَيَاةِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ حَتَّى مَضَى لِسَبِيلِهِ، فَلَمَّا أَنْ وُلِّيَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ عَمِلَ فِيهَا بِمَا عَمِلَ النَّبِيُّ فِي حَيَاتِهِ حَتَّى مَضَى لِسَبِيلِهِ، فَلَمَّا أَنْ وُلِّيَ عُمَرُ عَمِلَ فِيهَا بِمِثْلِ مَا عَمِلَا حَتَّىمَضَى لِسَبِيلِهِ

      [`Abdullah that Jareer told him that al-Mugheerah said: `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz gathered the children of Marwan when he received Khilafah, he said: “Rasul-Allah (saw) had Fadak, he used to spend from it on the little ones of bani Hashim and marry-off their bachelors, and Fatimah had asked him to grant her it during the life of Rasul-Allah (saw) so he refused and died, then Abu Bakr became in charge so he used it as Rasul-Allah (saw) did until he died, then `Umar…]

      At the end he says:

      فَرَأَيْتُ أَمْرًا مَنَعَهُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ فَاطِمَةَ عَلَيْهَا السَّلَام لَيْسَ لِي بِحَقٍّ وَأَنَا أُشْهِدُكُمْ أَنِّي قَدْ رَدَدْتُهَا عَلَى مَا كَانَتْ يَعْنِي عَلَى عَهْدِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ

      [So I saw a matter that Rasul-Allah (saw) prevented Fatimah, I have no right (to give it to you) so I ask you to bear witness that I have returned it to the way it was during the messenger’s (saw) time.]

      n the book of Tabaqat ibn Sa`d, it is a long one but confirms what we previously read, it says:

      كانت فدك صفيا لرسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فكانت لابن السبيل وسألته ابنته فدك أن يهبها لها فأبى رسول الله ذلك عليها

      [Fadak was purely the property of Rasul-Allah (saw) so he made it for the stranded travellers, then his daughter asked him for Fadak to grant it to her but he (saw) refused…]

      ولي عمر بن عبد العزيز الخلافة وما يقوم به وبعياله إلا هي تغل عشرة آلاف دينار في كل سنة وأقل قليلا وأكثر فلما ولي الخلافة سأل عن فدك وفحص عنها فأخبر بما كان من أمرها في عهد رسول الله وأبي بكر وعمر وعثمان حتى كان معاوية قال فكتب عمر إلى أبي بكر بن محمد بن عمرو بن حزم كتابا فيه بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم من عبد الله عمر أمير المؤمنين إلى أبي بكر بن محمد سلام عليك فإني أحمد إليك الله الذي لا إله إلا هو أما بعد فإني نظرت في أمر فدك وفحصت عنه فإذا هو لا يصلح لي ورأيت أن أردها على ما كانت عليه في عهد رسول الله وأبي بكر وعمر وعثمان وأترك ما حدث بعدهم فإذا جاءك كتابي هذا فاقبضها وولها رجلا يقوم فيها بالحق والسلام عليك

      […When `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz received the Khilafah, the land of Fadak supported him and his family and brought them 10,000 Dinars yearly, the Khalifah then began to investigate the matter of Fadak and was told of its past and how it was during the time of the messenger (saw) and Abu Bakr and `Umar and `Uthman until the time of Mu`awiyah. `Umar then wrote to Abu Bakr bin Muhammad bin `Amro bin Hazm a book: “In the name of Allah most merciful most glorious, (…until he said…) I have looked into the matter of Fadak and investigated thoroughly, and I found that it is not my right nor that of my children, I saw that I must return it to the way it was in the time of Rasul-Allah (saw) and Abu Bakr and `Umar and `Uthman and ignore all that happened after them. If my book reaches you, take the land and grant authority over it to a man who will use it justly, and peace be upon you.”]

      Please see this link for more detailed information:

      • Haha so funny. I actually didn’t copy my own work XD. It’s not suprising coming from Filthy Nasibis like you. What I posted disproves everything those two sites said. So many contradictions. Alhamdulillah I left Ahle Bidah wal Jamaa Alhamdulillah.

      • So are you the author of that article on that Shia website? The links I shared have refuted the content of the link you shared. Please read them.

  46. M.S.Jikan Malam

    The ways are many but the way of sucess is a single, try to open your eyes and see a pure light from almighty Allah. Sahabah are most respectable persons after our holy prophet(pbuh)

  47. ZAINAB

    You are the most lost being I have ever come across in a very long. I pray that you find guidance- in the meantime- ” may your mother weep for you”. For the record We the Shias-LOVERS of Lady Fatima al Zahra(SA) will be successful in both worlds.

  48. bergazeda

    Some thirty years back, the explaination (Tafseer) of the Holy Qur’an was issued in printed form by the Internationa Islamic University Islamabad.It was also distributed in the form of printed lectures, which I happened to read.The Tafseer was arrived at jointly by a commitee of the learned men and it stated that the decision of the Calif Abubakr , not to give the Fadak to Bibi Fatima was wrong.
    Bibi Khadijah salamAllah Alaiha ,was the richest woman of Arabia,.All her property went in the service of Islam and the Holy prophet .Isn’t it pity that her generation did not get what it rightly deserved.?

    • Ahlulbayt and Progeny of Ali became very WEALTHY after the Prophet (saw). They also had financial support from the CALIPHS. In fact, Umar during his rule gave a vast land to Ali.

      • Mohammadi

        Allah o Akbar.
        Are you kidding.Son of Abu talib had no money.if Abu talib had no financial and cast support from his ancestors then how he saved prophet from banu ummaya?

  49. Mohammadi

    I am waiting​ for your answer.
    1. If prophets do not leave inheritance then why suleman inhereted daud.
    2. If prophets do not leave inheritance then why hazrat zaakaria prayed to God for inheritance in surah maryum ayat 4.
    3.If prophets do not leave inheritance then why hazrat Aisha and hazrat Hafsa inherited prophet house and gave it to their father.
    Prophet had 9 wives,and if each wife was given its equal share not a single grave could be constructed, but there are two which mean that they both had ghazabed others right and are ghazibi.(as usual)

    • Salam,

      All your questions (and other questions you might have) have been answered here:

      • Mohammadi

        No answer about surah maryum ayat 4 only ideas has been quoted.if or that story.
        Why hazrat Umar bin abdulaziz returned it to Fatima’s(r.a) descents.also mamun alrasheed wanted to give it back.
        Reference:mulana shibli naumani.book manakab e Umar bin abdulaziz

      • mohammadi

        Why are you hiding all those references which I posted yesterday.
        Haqiqat chup nai sakti banawat k assolo se,
        K khusbu aa nai sakti kabhi kaghaz k phoolo se,

    • Khan

      Inheritance of Prophets is not in the form of property or gold or silver, dirham deenar. Rather inheritance is in terms of Prophethood, Knowledge, leadership. Suleman AS, Yahya AS inherited their fathers Prophethood, Knowledge of deen and Leadership. Property, Money had nothing to do with that. AbuBakr RA was right in saying that. Anbia donot leave wirasat in the form of Money or property.
      Regarding Houses given to prophets wives, i am surprised you do not see they were living in those houses in prophets lives. Prophet gave them in his life as it was his resonsibility as a husband to provide shelter to his wives. But Wives never claim that they have any right on Fadak.

  50. Mohammadi

    What you say about Sunan Abu Dawud, v3, p144, Dhikr Fa’y.
    Wafa Al wafa page 99.
    Tarik ul khulfa page 231.
    Tarik e yaqubi volume 2 page 199 volume 3 page 48.
    Wafa Al wafa page 200.
    How long will you deny unless you have no breath to repent.
    With what faith you will meet MOHAMMAD (P.B.U.H),as you remained supporter of those who ate Haq e Zahra(r.a).
    And do not hide my post this time.

  51. Mojtaba

    Volume 4, Book 53, Number 325:
    Narrated ‘Aisha:

    (mother of the believers) After the death of Allah ‘s Apostle Fatima the daughter of Allah’s Apostle asked Abu Bakr As-Siddiq to give her, her share of inheritance from what Allah’s Apostle had left of the Fai (i.e. booty gained without fighting) which Allah had given him. Abu Bakr said to her, “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Our property will not be inherited, whatever we (i.e. prophets) leave is Sadaqa (to be used for charity).” Fatima, the daughter of Allah’s Apostle got angry and stopped speaking to Abu Bakr, and continued assuming that attitude till she died. Fatima remained alive for six months after the death of Allah’s Apostle.
    here is the proof my brother and who ever angers fatima zahra angers the prophet PBUH

  52. zubzaa


  53. Aijaz

    Fear Allah, Hazrt Abu bakar, Hzrt Umar and Usman are not like Hazrt Ali. Hazrt Ali excels in many attributes and bears a cornucopia of characteristics which others do not owe:
    1. Hazrt Ali only person had birth in Kaabah,
    2. Opned eyes with his first glance at Prophet SAWW not at 360 idols.
    3. Only knowlegeable after prophet that even great sahabas took valuable piece of knowledge and wisdom from him. As Hazrt Umar once said” لو لا لعلی لھلک عمر” if had there been not Ali, umar would have parish”.
    4. Only fulk-fledged brave person as others used to escape battle grounds, i.e. Uhad, Khaiber, and Hunain.
    Note: 3rd and 4rth points, are likely to legalize superiority of person as a head of State. As exactly Quran states:
    “And their prophet said to them, “Indeed, Allah has sent to you Saul as a king.” They said, “How can he have kingship over us while we are more worthy of kingship than him and he has not been given any measure of wealth?” He said, “Indeed, Allah has chosen him over you and has increased him abundantly in knowledge and stature. And Allah gives His sovereignty to whom He wills. And Allah is all-Encompassing [in favor] and Knowing.”
    (Surah Al-Baqrah: 247)

    5. Only person whose ‘zikr’ ir praise is worship.
    Hazrt Aishah narrates that she said:
    “I saw my father (Abu Bakr Radi Allahu anhu) gazing often at ‘Ali’s face. I said: `O my father! I see you gazing often at ‘Ali’s face.’ He said: `O my daughter! I heard the Prophet Salla Allahu ta’ala ‘alayhi wa Sallam say: “Looking at the face of `Ali is worship.”‘
    6. Only person for whom Proohet said:
    ” Ali is with Haq and Haq with Ali”.
    7. Only person who was born Momin and Waliullah, and was not converted to Muslim like other sahabas.
    8. etc…….

    Needless to say, Shias and Sunni’s Books are rich in attributes of hazrt Ali. And such praises are not found in other sahabis. Keeping in view attributes of Hazrt Ali, ratiinal minds can tend to recognize superiority of Hzrt Ali over others. May Allah ressurect me with Prophet saww and his Ahl e bayat who are most superior to entire Umah though it be Haxrt Abu bakr, umar or Utman. Wasllam

    • Khan

      All claims need to substantiated by references. Shia books are full of fake stories. Even an Imam saying anything can not be taken as authentic as it is not possible to know whether it was said under taqayya or else.

  54. Zuman

    Vvvv beautiful

  55. Khan

    Fatima RA made a claim which was not right. Ali RA knew that and when he was made Khalifa he never returned to the Sons of Fatima RA and her daughter. Of course that is because he never agreed with the claim rather he agreed with what AbuBak al Siddique said.
    There is no point pointing fingers now when the very first Imam himslef followed the command of the fist Caliph.

  56. Qalander

    If the beloved Daughter of our Prophet came to HIS so close companion, SAYING THAT SOMETHING BELONGS TO HER , THAN HE SHOULD HAVE SIMPLY HANDED IT OVER.



    They should have just simply thought that if Fatima came asking for something, it must be Hers as she claims. Simply hand it over considering her closeness to Prophet.

    Just imagine the Lady of Heaven came asking for something from such a respected companion of Her father and leaving empty handed from his court.😭😭😭

  57. Ahl Sunnah

    Thank you for a very factual rebuttal of an obvious lie.

    My Shi’a friend used this as the basis for his research and now reverted to the true path of Ahl Sunnah and neglected the unkind words he used on the other sahabas of Rasul.

    He is now working within his family and community to help educate and correct the sinful views.


  58. Ummal baneen

    Ahmed Omar thank you man for speaking up ! Abu Bakr is a NOBODY compared to Bibi Fatima(s.a) and Ali ibn Abu talib(a.s) .. abu bakr said that the holy prophet (peace be upon him and his progeny) had said prophets don’t leave anything behind if any then it’s given as sadaqa ! And Ali Ibn Abu talib replied from THE HOLY QURAN (can’t be changed) about Solomon inherited David . So you supporting abu bakr is like going against The Holy Quran ! It’s disguising how hateful you are towards ahlul byat but supportive of Abu Bakr who clearly didn’t know what he was talking about . Brother you should increase your knowledge instead of spreading lies . And bibi Fatima (s.a) wasn’t angry about the bag e fidak she was upset with how abu bakr acted towards her . As well as Ayesha wasn’t the only Ummul momineen all of the wives were so men can’t marry them after the passing of the Holy prophet (peace be upon him and his progeny) .how come you guys don’t call Umm Salma ummul momineen? Brother read the Quran it clearly states do not hide the truth while knowing it .Have a great day

  59. Shoaib Khan

    i agreed with total article and Hazrat ABU BAKER RZ gave the answer with reference and main point why did Bibi FATIMA ZEHRA (RZ) claimed/demanded for fadak in living days of Prophet MOHAMMAD (SAWW) ? i ask rafidies

Leave a Reply to faiq Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s