Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘taqiyah’


By Hani (aka TripolySunni)
Posted by 13S2010

al-Salamu `Aleykum,

Al-Fayd al-Qudsi fî Tarjamah al-’Allâmah al-Majlissî, is the name of the book written by the famous Shia scholar al-Muhaddith al-Nûrî al-Tabarsî in which he writes the biography of the famous Shia scholar al-Allâmah al-Majlissî, in this book the author writes also about another well known and famous Shia scholar who goes by the name of al-Mawla Haydar Ali al-Shirwânî, this man is the author of famous Shia books such as “Manâqib Ahl al-Bayt”. His father Mîrzâ Muhammad ibn al-Hassan al-Shirwânî was a student of Muhammad Taqî al-Majlissî who is the father of al-’Allâmah Muhammad Bâqir al-Majlissî the author of “Bihâr al-Anwâr”.

Muhammad ibn al-Hassan al-Shirwânî married the daughter of Muhammad Taqî al-Majlissî, which makes Haydar Ali al-Shirwânî the nephew of Muhammad Bâqir al-Majlissî. Haydar Ali al-Shirwânî later married the daughter of Muhammad Bâqir al-Majlissî to become his son-in-law, this makes him really close to the Majlissî family.

In the introduction of the book “Manâqib Ahl al-Bayt” the researcher (Muhammad al-Hassun) says:

هو المولى حيدر علي ابن الشيخ المولى ميرزا محمد بن الحسن الشرواني، صهر المجلسي الثاني على ابنته التي كانت له من أخت أبي طالب خان النهاوندي. والشرواني نسبة إلى شروان

[He is al-Mawlâ Haydar Alî son of Sheikh al-Mawlâ Mîrzâ Muhammad ibn al-Hassan al-Shirwânî, the son-in-law of al-Majlissî II from his daughter through the sister of Abî Tâlib Khân al-Nahâwandî. And al-Shirwânî means that he is from the region of Shirwân.]

Let us see what this Shia scholar does in his free time by quoting this citation from “Al-Fayd al-Qudsi” page 250-151 and from “Bihâr al-Anwâr” volume 102, page 137:

قال في تتميم أمل الآمل مولانا حيدر علي بن المولى ميرزا الشيرواني كان فاضلا معظما و عالما مفخما كما علمناه من تعليقاته على المسالك و غيرها فإنها و إن كانت قليلة إلا أنها تدل على فضل محررها و بالجملة إنه من أهل الفضل مع أنه كان من أهل الزهد و التقوى أيضا إلا أنه ظهر منه أقوال مختصة به ينكر ذلك عليه و إن كان لبعضها قائل به من غيره سمعت أستادنا و استنادنا الفاضل الأعز و العالم الأكبر مولانا علي أصغر ( رهـ ) يحكي أنه كان يلعن جميع العلماء إلا السيد المرتضى و والده العلامة .و قد تحقق منه أنه كان يضيف أهل السنة إلى بيته و يصبر عليهم إلى أن تحصل له الفرصة و يتمكن مما يريد فيأخذ المدية بيده المرتعشة لكونه ناهزا في التسعين فيضعها في حلق أحدهم فيقتله بنهاية الزجر .و الحيدرية المنسوبة إليه كانوا يصومون فيريدون أن يفطروا بالحلال فيمشون إلى دكاكين أهل السنة أو بيوتهم فيسرقون شيئا و يفطرون به و من آرائهم عدم رجحان صوم يوم الإثنين أو حرمته و إن وافى يوم الغدير و منها حكمهم بخروج غير الإمامية من دين الإسلام و الحكم بنجاستهم و كذا من شك في ذلك إلى غيرها من الآراء و رأيت منه رسالة حكم فيها بوجوب الاجتهاد على الأعيان كما هو رأي علماء حلب و أشبع الكلام في ذلك لكنه مزيف انتهى .

و له رسالة في تنجس غير الإمامي و خروجهم عن الإسلام و للمولى زين الدين الخوانساري رسالة في الرد عليه .

[He said in "Tatmim Amal al-Aamil"(book of biographies written by `Abdul-Nabi bin Muhammad Taqi al-Qazwini): "Our Mawlâ Haydar Alî son of Mawlâ Mîrzâ Muhammad ibn al-Hassan al-Shirwânî, he was a virtuous, venerated and great scholar like we knew from his commentaries on al-Masalik and other works even if only little but they show the value of their writer. In brief, he is from the noble people, (but) even though he was from the people of asceticism and piety he also said some things that may lead us to reproach him even if others said them as well. I heard our professor and virtuous reference, the grand scholar Mawlâna `Ali Asghar (rah) say that he(Haydar Alî Shirwânî) used to curse all scholars except al-Sayyed al-Murtadâ and his father al-`Allamah.

And it has been verified about him that he used to receive Ahlul-Sunnah at his place as guests, and he used to exercise patience with them until he gets a chance to fulfill his aim, he would then take a knife with his trembling hand because he was near his nineties, and he would plunge it in their throat killing them after making them suffer.

And al-Haydariyyah(sect) which is attributed to him, used to fast and when they needed to break their fast in a Halal way, they would seek the shops or homes of Ahlul-Sunnah in order to steal anything and consume it on Iftar, also from their opinions is the non-desirability of fasting on Monday or its impremssibility even if it coincided with the day of Ghadeer, and from their opinions is that all non-Imamis are outside the folds of Islam, and they are impure and so are those who doubt this matter and other opinions, and I saw from him a Rissâlah(research paper) in which he ruled that it is obligatory for the elites to practice al-Ijtihâd as was the opinion of the scholars of Aleppo(Halab) and it has been discussed thoroughly and it is forged."

And he has a Rissâlah about the Najasah of the non-Imami and that they are not in the folds of Islam, and al-Mawlâ Zain al-Deen al-Khawansârî wrote a Rissâlah to refute him.]

After you have discovered the truth of this great venerated Shia scholar, let us read what their scholar al-Khawansârî wrote about him in “Rawdât al-Jannât”:

المولى الفاضل ، المشتهر بالمولى حيدر علي

[The virtuous Mawlâ, famous with the name al-Mawlâ Haydar Alî.]

While Muhsin al-Âmîn wrote about him in “A’yân al-Shî’ah”:

كان عالماً فاضلاً
[He was a virtuous scholar.]
And here is the document below:
Special thanks to the brothers at “al-taqiya.net“wal-Salamu `Aleykum,

Read Full Post »


بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم

Can ‘Infallable’ Imams lie upon the Prophet of Allah (saw)?

We see alot, the shia scholars reject their own Ahadeeth by saying they are from Taqqiya and not acceptable. The shia claim that the Imams did Taqqiyah because their lives were in danger.

However, when we see these Ahadeeth that they reject, in most cases they are not said under Taqqiyah of Fear, meaning there were no threats to their life.

Even if there was fear, for example the ‘Infallable’ Imam feared that he would be killed. But didn’t the ‘infallable’ Imams read the glorious Quran? Didn’t they know about the verses of Quran?

Lets see what the Quran says:

الْيَوْمَ يَئِسَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِن دِينِكُمْ فَلَا تَخْشَوْهُمْ وَاخْشَوْنِ ۚ الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ وَأَتْمَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ نِعْمَتِي وَرَضِيتُ لَكُمُ الْإِسْلَامَ دِينًا ۚ فَمَنِ اضْطُرَّ فِي مَخْمَصَةٍ غَيْرَ مُتَجَانِفٍ لِّإِثْمٍ ۙ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ

This day those who disbelieve have despaired of [defeating] your religion; so fear them not, but fear Me. This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion.But whoever is forced by severe hunger with no inclination to sin – then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. [Quran 5:3]

In the above verse, Allah (swt) explicitly orders us to fear him only, not the disblievers. In this site (islamtxt.net) we proved that the ‘infallable’ Imams were in so much Taqqiyah that they even denied their own Imamate.

We are going to bring narrations in which the ‘Infallable’ Imams explicitly did Taqqiyah when answering the questions of people and even said that it is also the view of the Messenger of Allah (saw).

Now the question arises, if the ‘infallable’ Imams were living in fear, why didn’t they just keep slient? Didn’t the ‘infallable’ know that giving wrong answer would further misguide the questioner and the people?

As we all know telling lies upon the Messenger of Allah (saw) is Haram, and the one who does it, his place is the hell fire.

من كذب علي متعمدا فليتبوأ مقعده من النار
Whoever tells lies about me deliberately, let him take his place in Hell. [Agreed Upon]

Now we are going to quote the shia Ahadeeth in which the ‘Infallable’ Imams lied upon the Prophet of Allah(saw).

نجم الدين الطبسي – ص 48

- التهذيب ” وعنه علي بن الحسن بن فضال – ، عن يعقوب بن يزيد ، عن أبي همام ، عن أبي الحسن (عليه السلام ) قال : صام رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم يوم عاشوراء “.

وثقه المجلسي فقال : “موثق ” وحمله المحقق القمي وغيره على التقية

Abi Al-hasan (as) says that the Messenger of Allah (saw) used to fast on the day of Ashura.

Majlisi confirmed the narration but they say it was said under Taqqiyah. What does it mean? It means the messenger of Allah (saw) didn’t do such thing but since the Imam was living in fear, he lied upon the messenger of Allah (saw).

The other narration is in: تهذیب الاحکام باب ضروب النکاح ص252
A narration from Zaid bin Ali from Ali (ra) with Saheeh Sanad that the messenger of Allah (saw) forbade eating domestic donkeys and the Nikah of Muta.

What the shia scholars say? It was said in Taqqiyah, meaning the messenger of Allah (saw) didn’t say those words but the ‘infallable’ Imam lied upon the Prophet (saw).

Now we ask the readers can ‘infallable’ Imam lie upon the Prophet (saw)? Isn’t the place of the person in hell who lies upon the Prophet (saw)? Is lying not against the ‘infallabality’?

Original Article in Farsi by Brother Hasani Hashimi

Note: We Ahl-Sonnat don’t believe that Imam Jafar (ra) or any other Imams lied upon the Messenger of Allah (saw). We are just showing how the shia scholars accuse the Imams (rah) of lying upon the Messenger of Allah (saw).

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 65 other followers

%d bloggers like this: